Paper detail

ACReL: Adversarial Conditional value-at-risk Reinforcement Learning

In the classical Reinforcement Learning (RL) setting, one aims to find a policy that maximizes its expected return. This objective may be inappropriate in safety-critical domains such as healthcare or autonomous driving, where intrinsic uncertainties due to stochastic policies and environment variability may lead to catastrophic failures. This can be addressed by using the Conditional-Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to instill risk-aversion in learned policies. In this paper, we propose Adversarial Cvar Reinforcement Learning (ACReL), a novel adversarial meta-algorithm to optimize the CVaR objective in RL. ACReL is based on a max-min between a policy player and a learned adversary that perturbs the policy player's state transitions given a finite budget. We prove that, the closer the players are to the game's equilibrium point, the closer the learned policy is to the CVaR-optimal one with a risk tolerance explicitly related to the adversary's budget. We provide a gradient-based training procedure to solve the proposed game by formulating it as a Stackelberg game, enabling the use of deep RL architectures and training algorithms. Empirical experiments show that ACReL matches a CVaR RL state-of-the-art baseline for retrieving CVaR optimal policies, while also benefiting from theoretical guarantees.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.