Paper detail

Accurately Modeling Biased Random Walks on Weighted Graphs Using $\textit{Node2vec+}$

Node embedding is a powerful approach for representing the structural role of each node in a graph. $\textit{Node2vec}$ is a widely used method for node embedding that works by exploring the local neighborhoods via biased random walks on the graph. However, $\textit{node2vec}$ does not consider edge weights when computing walk biases. This intrinsic limitation prevents $\textit{node2vec}$ from leveraging all the information in weighted graphs and, in turn, limits its application to many real-world networks that are weighted and dense. Here, we naturally extend $\textit{node2vec}$ to $\textit{node2vec+}$ in a way that accounts for edge weights when calculating walk biases, but which reduces to $\textit{node2vec}$ in the cases of unweighted graphs or unbiased walks. We empirically show that $\textit{node2vec+}$ is more robust to additive noise than $\textit{node2vec}$ in weighted graphs using two synthetic datasets. We also demonstrate that $\textit{node2vec+}$ significantly outperforms $\textit{node2vec}$ on a commonly benchmarked multi-label dataset (Wikipedia). Furthermore, we test $\textit{node2vec+}$ against GCN and GraphSAGE using various challenging gene classification tasks on two protein-protein interaction networks. Despite some clear advantages of GCN and GraphSAGE, they show comparable performance with $\textit{node2vec+}$. Finally, $\textit{node2vec+}$ can be used as a general approach for generating biased random walks, benefiting all existing methods built on top of $\textit{node2vec}$. $\textit{Node2vec+}$ is implemented as part of $\texttt{PecanPy}$, which is available at https://github.com/krishnanlab/PecanPy .

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.