Paper detail

A Test Bench For Evaluating Exoskeletons For Upper Limb Rehabilitation

The potential of wearable robotics technology is undeniable. However, quantifying its value is difficult. Various types of exoskeleton robots have already been developed and tested for upper limb rehabilitation but, evaluations are not standardized, particularly in pediatric rehabilitation. This paper proposes a methodology for the quantitative evaluation of upper limb exoskeletons that, like a test bench, would serve for replicable testing. We determined the range of motion (ROM) and joint torques using both kinematic modeling and experimental measurements (using sensors integrated into Dynamixel actuators). The proposed test bench can provide an accurate range of motion (ROM) and joint torques during the pronation-supination (PS) task. The range of motion obtained with the physical prototype was approximately 156.26 +- 4.71° during the PS task, while it was approximately 146.84 +- 14.32° for the multibody model. The results show that the average range of experimental torques (0.28 +- 0.06 N.m) was overestimated by 40% and just 3.4%, respectively, when compared to the average range of simulated torques (0.2 +- 0.05 N.m) and to the highest range of simulated torques (0.29 N.m). For the experimental measurements, test-retest reliability was excellent (0.96-0.98) within sessions and excellent (0.93) or good (0.81-0.86) between sessions. Finally, the suggested approach provides a ROM close to the normal ROM necessary during PS tasks. These results validate the measurements' accuracy and underline the proposed methodology's relevance. The proposed test bench could become a reference standard for evaluating exoskeletons. This study also addresses a methodological aspect on the accurate assessment of joint torques that can serve in applications such as the sizing of actuators in exoskeletons or the non-invasive evaluation of muscle forces in the human body.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.