Researcher profile

Clautilde Nguiadem

Clautilde Nguiadem contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

A Test Bench For Evaluating Exoskeletons For Upper Limb Rehabilitation

The potential of wearable robotics technology is undeniable. However, quantifying its value is difficult. Various types of exoskeleton robots have already been developed and tested for upper limb rehabilitation but, evaluations are not standardized, particularly in pediatric rehabilitation. This paper proposes a methodology for the quantitative evaluation of upper limb exoskeletons that, like a test bench, would serve for replicable testing. We determined the range of motion (ROM) and joint torques using both kinematic modeling and experimental measurements (using sensors integrated into Dynamixel actuators). The proposed test bench can provide an accurate range of motion (ROM) and joint torques during the pronation-supination (PS) task. The range of motion obtained with the physical prototype was approximately 156.26 +- 4.71° during the PS task, while it was approximately 146.84 +- 14.32° for the multibody model. The results show that the average range of experimental torques (0.28 +- 0.06 N.m) was overestimated by 40% and just 3.4%, respectively, when compared to the average range of simulated torques (0.2 +- 0.05 N.m) and to the highest range of simulated torques (0.29 N.m). For the experimental measurements, test-retest reliability was excellent (0.96-0.98) within sessions and excellent (0.93) or good (0.81-0.86) between sessions. Finally, the suggested approach provides a ROM close to the normal ROM necessary during PS tasks. These results validate the measurements' accuracy and underline the proposed methodology's relevance. The proposed test bench could become a reference standard for evaluating exoskeletons. This study also addresses a methodological aspect on the accurate assessment of joint torques that can serve in applications such as the sizing of actuators in exoskeletons or the non-invasive evaluation of muscle forces in the human body.