Paper detail

A sparse code increases the speed and efficiency of neuro-dynamic programming for optimal control tasks with correlated inputs

Sparse codes in neuroscience have been suggested to offer certain computational advantages over other neural representations of sensory data. To explore this viewpoint, a sparse code is used to represent natural images in an optimal control task solved with neuro-dynamic programming, and its computational properties are investigated. The central finding is that when feature inputs to a linear network are correlated, an over-complete sparse code increases the memory capacity of the network in an efficient manner beyond that possible for any complete code with the same-sized input, and also increases the speed of learning the network weights. A complete sparse code is found to maximise the memory capacity of a linear network by decorrelating its feature inputs to transform the design matrix of the least-squares problem to one of full rank. It also conditions the Hessian matrix of the least-squares problem, thereby increasing the rate of convergence to the optimal network weights. Other types of decorrelating codes would also achieve this. However, an over-complete sparse code is found to be approximately decorrelated, extracting a larger number of approximately decorrelated features from the same-sized input, allowing it to efficiently increase memory capacity beyond that possible for any complete code: a 2.25 times over-complete sparse code is shown to at least double memory capacity compared with a complete sparse code using the same input. This is used in sequential learning to store a potentially large number of optimal control tasks in the network, while catastrophic forgetting is avoided using a partitioned representation, yielding a cost-to-go function approximator that generalizes over the states in each partition. Sparse code advantages over dense codes and local codes are also discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.