Source author record

Peter N. Loxley

Peter N. Loxley appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
0close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A sparse code increases the speed and efficiency of neuro-dynamic programming for optimal control tasks with correlated inputs

Sparse codes in neuroscience have been suggested to offer certain computational advantages over other neural representations of sensory data. To explore this viewpoint, a sparse code is used to represent natural images in an optimal control task solved with neuro-dynamic programming, and its computational properties are investigated. The central finding is that when feature inputs to a linear network are correlated, an over-complete sparse code increases the memory capacity of the network in an efficient manner beyond that possible for any complete code with the same-sized input, and also increases the speed of learning the network weights. A complete sparse code is found to maximise the memory capacity of a linear network by decorrelating its feature inputs to transform the design matrix of the least-squares problem to one of full rank. It also conditions the Hessian matrix of the least-squares problem, thereby increasing the rate of convergence to the optimal network weights. Other types of decorrelating codes would also achieve this. However, an over-complete sparse code is found to be approximately decorrelated, extracting a larger number of approximately decorrelated features from the same-sized input, allowing it to efficiently increase memory capacity beyond that possible for any complete code: a 2.25 times over-complete sparse code is shown to at least double memory capacity compared with a complete sparse code using the same input. This is used in sequential learning to store a potentially large number of optimal control tasks in the network, while catastrophic forgetting is avoided using a partitioned representation, yielding a cost-to-go function approximator that generalizes over the states in each partition. Sparse code advantages over dense codes and local codes are also discussed.