Paper detail

A simple consistent Bayes factor for testing the Kendall rank correlation coefficient

In this paper, we propose a simple and easy-to-implement Bayesian hypothesis test for the presence of an association, described by Kendall's τcoefficient, between two variables measured on at least an ordinal scale. Owing to the absence of the likelihood functions for the data, we employ the asymptotic sampling distributions of the test statistic as the working likelihoods and then specify a truncated normal prior distribution on the noncentrality parameter of the alternative hypothesis, which results in the Bayes factor available in closed form in terms of the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution. Investigating the asymptotic behavior of the Bayes factor we find the conditions of the priors so that it is consistent to whichever the hypothesis is true. Simulation studies and a real-data application are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed Bayes factor. It deserves mentioning that the proposed method can be easily covered in undergraduate and graduate courses in nonparametric statistics with an emphasis on students' Bayesian thinking for data analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.