BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Keying Ye

Keying Ye appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
MethodologyApplications

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A simple consistent Bayes factor for testing the Kendall rank correlation coefficient

In this paper, we propose a simple and easy-to-implement Bayesian hypothesis test for the presence of an association, described by Kendall's τcoefficient, between two variables measured on at least an ordinal scale. Owing to the absence of the likelihood functions for the data, we employ the asymptotic sampling distributions of the test statistic as the working likelihoods and then specify a truncated normal prior distribution on the noncentrality parameter of the alternative hypothesis, which results in the Bayes factor available in closed form in terms of the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution. Investigating the asymptotic behavior of the Bayes factor we find the conditions of the priors so that it is consistent to whichever the hypothesis is true. Simulation studies and a real-data application are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed Bayes factor. It deserves mentioning that the proposed method can be easily covered in undergraduate and graduate courses in nonparametric statistics with an emphasis on students' Bayesian thinking for data analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Study on the Power Parameter in Power Prior Bayesian Analysis

The power prior and its variations have been proven to be a useful class of informative priors in Bayesian inference due to their flexibility in incorporating the historical information by raising the likelihood of the historical data to a fractional power δ. The derivation of the marginal likelihood based on the original power prior,and its variation, the normalized power prior, introduces a scaling factor C(δ) in the form of a prior predictive distribution with powered likelihood. In this paper, we show that the scaling factor might be infinite for some positive δ with conventionally used initial priors, which would change the admissible set of the power parameter. This result seems to have been almost completely ignored in the literature. We then illustrate that such a phenomenon may jeopardize the posterior inference under the power priors when the initial prior of the model parameters is improper. The main findings of this paper suggest that special attention should be paid when the suggested level of borrowing is close to 0, while the actual optimum might be below the suggested value. We use a normal linear model as an example for illustrative purposes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Normalized Power Prior Bayesian Analysis

The elicitation of power priors, based on the availability of historical data, is realized by raising the likelihood function of the historical data to a fractional power δ, which quantifies the degree of discounting of the historical information in making inference with the current data. When δ is not pre-specified and is treated as random, it can be estimated from the data using Bayesian updating paradigm. However, in the original form of the joint power prior Bayesian approach, certain positive constants before the likelihood of the historical data could be multiplied when different settings of sufficient statistics are employed. This would change the power priors with different constants, and hence the likelihood principle is violated. In this article, we investigate a normalized power prior approach which obeys the likelihood principle and is a modified form of the joint power prior. The optimality properties of the normalized power prior in the sense of minimizing the weighted Kullback-Leibler divergence is investigated. By examining the posteriors of several commonly used distributions, we show that the discrepancy between the historical and the current data can be well quantified by the power parameter under the normalized power prior setting. Efficient algorithms to compute the scale factor is also proposed. In addition, we illustrate the use of the normalized power prior Bayesian analysis with three data examples, and provide an implementation with an R package NPP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access