Paper detail

A Process for the Evaluation of Node Embedding Methods in the Context of Node Classification

Node embedding methods find latent lower-dimensional representations which are used as features in machine learning models. In the last few years, these methods have become extremely popular as a replacement for manual feature engineering. Since authors use various approaches for the evaluation of node embedding methods, existing studies can rarely be efficiently and accurately compared. We address this issue by developing a process for a fair and objective evaluation of node embedding procedures w.r.t. node classification. This process supports researchers and practitioners to compare new and existing methods in a reproducible way. We apply this process to four popular node embedding methods and make valuable observations. With an appropriate combination of hyperparameters, good performance can be achieved even with embeddings of lower dimensions, which is positive for the run times of the downstream machine learning task and the embedding algorithm. Multiple hyperparameter combinations yield similar performance. Thus, no extensive, time-consuming search is required to achieve reasonable performance in most cases.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.