Paper detail

A practical test for a planted community in heterogeneous networks

One of the fundamental task in graph data mining is to find a planted community(dense subgraph), which has wide application in biology, finance, spam detection and so on. For a real network data, the existence of a dense subgraph is generally unknown. Statistical tests have been devised to testing the existence of dense subgraph in a homogeneous random graph. However, many networks present extreme heterogeneity, that is, the degrees of nodes or vertexes don't concentrate on a typical value. The existing tests designed for homogeneous random graph are not straightforwardly applicable to the heterogeneous case. Recently, scan test was proposed for detecting a dense subgraph in heterogeneous(inhomogeneous) graph(\cite{BCHV19}). However, the computational complexity of the scan test is generally not polynomial in the graph size, which makes the test impractical for large or moderate networks. In this paper, we propose a polynomial-time test that has the standard normal distribution as the null limiting distribution. The power of the test is theoretically investigated and we evaluate the performance of the test by simulation and real data example.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.