Paper detail

A possible trial beyond the conventional random phase approximation for the su(2)-Lipkin model including the case of non-closed shell system

Concerning the su(2)-Lipkin model, the calculation of the excitation energy to the 1st excited-state gives rise to the following fact: The two results based on the exact treatment and the conventional random phase approximation (RPA) are in unexpected disagreement. In order to remove this discrepancy, the conventional RPA is renewed. With the aim of this renewal, the terms, which cannot be dealt with in the conventional one, are estimated. The basic framework of this new form is not reorganized from that of the conventional one. In addition, the su(2)-Lipkin model itself is also modified so as to be applicable to the case with non-closed shell system. To this modification, one more su(2)-algebra, which has been already proposed by the present authors, is applied. Through the use of this algebra, the su(2)-Lipkin model is applicable to the case with any total fermion number permitted in the model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.