Paper detail

A phenomenological study of 5d supersymmetry

Supersymmetry and extra dimension need not be mutually exclusive options of physics for the TeV scale and beyond. In this paper, we envisage a phenomenological scenario by embedding the 4d constrained minimal supersymmetric standard model in a flat 5d $S_1 /Z_2$ orbifold, with the inverse radius of compactification at the TeV scale. The gauge, Higgs and the third generation matter multiplets are placed in the bulk. From a 4d perspective, the bulk has N=2 supersymmetry which entails a special non-renormalization theorem giving rise to a significant numerical impact on the renormalization group running of various parameters. The brane supersymmetry corresponds to N=1 which we assume to be broken in an unspecified but phenomenologically acceptable way. Given this set-up, we study how the gauge and Yukawa couplings and the N=1 brane supersymmetry breaking soft masses run through the energy scale exciting the Kaluza-Klein states at regular interval. We present our results by showing the allowed/disallowed zone in the plane of the common scalar mass ($m_0$) and common gaugino mass ($M_{1/2}$). Our plots are the first 5d versions of the often displayed 4d $m_0$--$M_{1/2}$ plots, and we provide reasons behind the differences between the 4d and 5d plots.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.