Paper detail

A Novel Method for ECG Signal Classification via One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network

This paper presents an end-to-end ECG signal classification method based on a novel segmentation strategy via 1D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to aid the classification of ECG signals. The ECG segmentation strategy named R-R-R strategy (i.e., retaining ECG data between the R peaks just before and after the current R peak) for segmenting the original ECG data into segments in order to train and test the 1D CNN models. The novel strategy mimics physicians in scanning ECG to a greater extent, and maximizes the inherent information of ECG segments. The performance of the classification models for 5-class and 6-class are verified with ECG signals from 48 records of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. As the heartbeat types are divided into 5 classes (i.e., normal beat, left bundle branch block beat, right bundle branch block beat, ventricular ectopic beat, and paced beat) in the MIT-BIH, the best classification accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), the sensitivity and the F1-score reach 99.24%, 0.9994, 0.99 and 0.99, respectively. As the heartbeat types are divided into 6 classes (i.e., normal beat, left bundle branch block beat, right bundle branch block beat, ventricular ectopic beat, paced beat and other beats) in the MIT-BIH, the beat classification accuracy, the AUC, the sensitivity, and the F1-score reach 97.02%, 0.9966, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively. Meanwhile, according to the recommended practice from the Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), the heartbeat types are divided into 5 classes (i.e., normal beat, supraventricular ectopic beats, ventricular ectopic beats, fusion beats, and unclassifiable beats), the beat classification accuracy, the sensitivity, and the F1-score reach 97.45%, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively. The experimental results show that the proposed method achieves better performance than the state-of-the-art methods.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.