Paper detail

A novel 3D multi-path DenseNet for improving automatic segmentation of glioblastoma on pre-operative multi-modal MR images

Convolutional neural networks have achieved excellent results in automatic medical image segmentation. In this study, we proposed a novel 3D multi-path DenseNet for generating the accurate glioblastoma (GBM) tumor contour from four multi-modal pre-operative MR images. We hypothesized that the multi-path architecture could achieve more accurate segmentation than a single-path architecture. 258 GBM patients were included in this study. Each patient had four MR images (T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR) and the manually segmented tumor contour. We built a 3D multi-path DenseNet that could be trained to generate the corresponding GBM tumor contour from the four MR images. A 3D single-path DenseNet was also built for comparison. Both DenseNets were based on the encoder-decoder architecture. All four images were concatenated and fed into a single encoder path in the single-path DenseNet, while each input image had its own encoder path in the multi-path DenseNet. The patient cohort was randomly split into a training set of 180 patients, a validation set of 39 patients, and a testing set of 39 patients. Model performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average surface distance (ASD), and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95%). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to examine the model differences. The single-path DenseNet achieved a DSC of 0.911$\pm$0.060, ASD of 1.3$\pm$0.7 mm, and HD95% of 5.2$\pm$7.1 mm, while the multi-path DenseNet achieved a DSC of 0.922$\pm$0.041, ASD of 1.1$\pm$0.5 mm, and HD95% of 3.9$\pm$3.3 mm. The p-values of all Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were less than 0.05. Both 3D DenseNets generated GBM tumor contours in good agreement with the manually segmented contours from multi-modal MR images. The multi-path DenseNet achieved more accurate tumor segmentation than the single-path DenseNet.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.