Researcher profile

John H. Lewis

John H. Lewis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A novel 3D multi-path DenseNet for improving automatic segmentation of glioblastoma on pre-operative multi-modal MR images

Convolutional neural networks have achieved excellent results in automatic medical image segmentation. In this study, we proposed a novel 3D multi-path DenseNet for generating the accurate glioblastoma (GBM) tumor contour from four multi-modal pre-operative MR images. We hypothesized that the multi-path architecture could achieve more accurate segmentation than a single-path architecture. 258 GBM patients were included in this study. Each patient had four MR images (T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR) and the manually segmented tumor contour. We built a 3D multi-path DenseNet that could be trained to generate the corresponding GBM tumor contour from the four MR images. A 3D single-path DenseNet was also built for comparison. Both DenseNets were based on the encoder-decoder architecture. All four images were concatenated and fed into a single encoder path in the single-path DenseNet, while each input image had its own encoder path in the multi-path DenseNet. The patient cohort was randomly split into a training set of 180 patients, a validation set of 39 patients, and a testing set of 39 patients. Model performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average surface distance (ASD), and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95%). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to examine the model differences. The single-path DenseNet achieved a DSC of 0.911$\pm$0.060, ASD of 1.3$\pm$0.7 mm, and HD95% of 5.2$\pm$7.1 mm, while the multi-path DenseNet achieved a DSC of 0.922$\pm$0.041, ASD of 1.1$\pm$0.5 mm, and HD95% of 3.9$\pm$3.3 mm. The p-values of all Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were less than 0.05. Both 3D DenseNets generated GBM tumor contours in good agreement with the manually segmented contours from multi-modal MR images. The multi-path DenseNet achieved more accurate tumor segmentation than the single-path DenseNet.

preprint2019arXiv

Generation of abdominal synthetic CTs from 0.35T MR images using generative adversarial networks for MR-only liver radiotherapy

Electron density maps must be accurately estimated to achieve valid dose calculation in MR-only radiotherapy. The goal of this study is to assess whether two deep learning models, the conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) and the cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (cycleGAN), can generate accurate abdominal synthetic CT (sCT) images from 0.35T MR images for MR-only liver radiotherapy. A retrospective study was performed using CT images and 0.35T MR images of 12 patients with liver (n=8) and non-liver abdominal (n=4) cancer. CT images were deformably registered to the corresponding MR images to generate deformed CT (dCT) images for treatment planning. Both cGAN and cycleGAN were trained using MR and dCT transverse slices. Four-fold cross-validation testing was conducted to generate sCT images for all patients. The HU prediction accuracy was evaluated by voxel-wise similarity metric between each dCT and sCT image for all 12 patients. dCT-based and sCT-based dose distributions were compared using gamma and dose-volume histogram (DVH) metric analysis for 8 liver patients. sCTcycleGAN achieved the average mean absolute error (MAE) of 94.1 HU, while sCTcGAN achieved 89.8 HU. In both models, the average gamma passing rates within all volumes of interest were higher than 95% using a 2%, 2 mm criterion, and 99% using a 3%, 3 mm criterion. The average differences in the mean dose and DVH metrics were within +/-0.6% for the planning target volume and within +/-0.15% for evaluated organs in both models. Results demonstrated that abdominal sCT images generated by both cGAN and cycleGAN achieved accurate dose calculation for 8 liver radiotherapy plans. sCTcGAN images had smaller average MAE and achieved better dose calculation accuracy than sCTcyleGAN images. More abdominal patients will be enrolled in the future to further evaluate two models.