BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dan Ruan

Dan Ruan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.IVComputer Visionphysics.med-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Learn2Reg 2024: New Benchmark Datasets Driving Progress on New Challenges

Medical image registration is critical for clinical applications, and fair benchmarking of different methods is essential for monitoring ongoing progress in the field. To date, the Learn2Reg 2020-2023 challenges have released several complementary datasets and established metrics for evaluations. Building on this foundation, the 2024 edition expands the challenge's scope to cover a wider range of registration scenarios, particularly in terms of modality diversity and task complexity, by introducing three new tasks, including large-scale multi-modal registration and unsupervised inter-subject brain registration, as well as the first microscopy-focused benchmark within Learn2Reg. The new datasets also inspired new method developments, including invertibility constraints, pyramid features, keypoints alignment and instance optimisation. Visit Learn2Reg at https://learn2reg.grand-challenge.org.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

To what extent can Plug-and-Play methods outperform neural networks alone in low-dose CT reconstruction

The Plug-and-Play (PnP) framework was recently introduced for low-dose CT reconstruction to leverage the interpretability and the flexibility of model-based methods to incorporate various plugins, such as trained deep learning (DL) neural networks. However, the benefits of PnP vs. state-of-the-art DL methods have not been clearly demonstrated. In this work, we proposed an improved PnP framework to address the previous limitations and develop clinical-relevant segmentation metrics for quantitative result assessment. Compared with the DL alone methods, our proposed PnP framework was slightly inferior in MSE and PSNR. However, the power spectrum of the resulting images better matched that of full-dose images than that of DL denoised images. The resulting images supported higher accuracy in airway segmentation than DL denoised images for all the ten patients in the test set, more substantially on the airways with a cross-section smaller than 0.61cm$^2$, and outperformed the DL denoised images for 45 out of 50 lung lobes in lobar segmentation. Our PnP method proved to be significantly better at preserving the image texture, which translated to task-specific benefits in automated structure segmentation and detection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A novel 3D multi-path DenseNet for improving automatic segmentation of glioblastoma on pre-operative multi-modal MR images

Convolutional neural networks have achieved excellent results in automatic medical image segmentation. In this study, we proposed a novel 3D multi-path DenseNet for generating the accurate glioblastoma (GBM) tumor contour from four multi-modal pre-operative MR images. We hypothesized that the multi-path architecture could achieve more accurate segmentation than a single-path architecture. 258 GBM patients were included in this study. Each patient had four MR images (T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR) and the manually segmented tumor contour. We built a 3D multi-path DenseNet that could be trained to generate the corresponding GBM tumor contour from the four MR images. A 3D single-path DenseNet was also built for comparison. Both DenseNets were based on the encoder-decoder architecture. All four images were concatenated and fed into a single encoder path in the single-path DenseNet, while each input image had its own encoder path in the multi-path DenseNet. The patient cohort was randomly split into a training set of 180 patients, a validation set of 39 patients, and a testing set of 39 patients. Model performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average surface distance (ASD), and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95%). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to examine the model differences. The single-path DenseNet achieved a DSC of 0.911$\pm$0.060, ASD of 1.3$\pm$0.7 mm, and HD95% of 5.2$\pm$7.1 mm, while the multi-path DenseNet achieved a DSC of 0.922$\pm$0.041, ASD of 1.1$\pm$0.5 mm, and HD95% of 3.9$\pm$3.3 mm. The p-values of all Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were less than 0.05. Both 3D DenseNets generated GBM tumor contours in good agreement with the manually segmented contours from multi-modal MR images. The multi-path DenseNet achieved more accurate tumor segmentation than the single-path DenseNet.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Fully Automated Multi-Organ Segmentation in Abdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Deep Neural Networks

Segmentation of multiple organs-at-risk (OARs) is essential for radiation therapy treatment planning and other clinical applications. We developed an Automated deep Learning-based Abdominal Multi-Organ segmentation (ALAMO) framework based on 2D U-net and a densely connected network structure with tailored design in data augmentation and training procedures such as deep connection, auxiliary supervision, and multi-view. The model takes in multi-slice MR images and generates the output of segmentation results. Three-Tesla T1 VIBE (Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination) images of 102 subjects were collected and used in our study. Ten OARs were studied, including the liver, spleen, pancreas, left/right kidneys, stomach, duodenum, small intestine, spinal cord, and vertebral bodies. Two radiologists manually labeled and obtained the consensus contours as the ground-truth. In the complete cohort of 102, 20 samples were held out for independent testing, and the rest were used for training and validation. The performance was measured using volume overlapping and surface distance. The ALAMO framework generated segmentation labels in good agreement with the manual results. Specifically, among the 10 OARs, 9 achieved high Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSCs) in the range of 0.87-0.96, except for the duodenum with a DSC of 0.80. The inference completes within one minute for a 3D volume of 320x288x180. Overall, the ALAMO model matches the state-of-the-art performance. The proposed ALAMO framework allows for fully automated abdominal MR segmentation with high accuracy and low memory and computation time demands.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Generation of abdominal synthetic CTs from 0.35T MR images using generative adversarial networks for MR-only liver radiotherapy

Electron density maps must be accurately estimated to achieve valid dose calculation in MR-only radiotherapy. The goal of this study is to assess whether two deep learning models, the conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) and the cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (cycleGAN), can generate accurate abdominal synthetic CT (sCT) images from 0.35T MR images for MR-only liver radiotherapy. A retrospective study was performed using CT images and 0.35T MR images of 12 patients with liver (n=8) and non-liver abdominal (n=4) cancer. CT images were deformably registered to the corresponding MR images to generate deformed CT (dCT) images for treatment planning. Both cGAN and cycleGAN were trained using MR and dCT transverse slices. Four-fold cross-validation testing was conducted to generate sCT images for all patients. The HU prediction accuracy was evaluated by voxel-wise similarity metric between each dCT and sCT image for all 12 patients. dCT-based and sCT-based dose distributions were compared using gamma and dose-volume histogram (DVH) metric analysis for 8 liver patients. sCTcycleGAN achieved the average mean absolute error (MAE) of 94.1 HU, while sCTcGAN achieved 89.8 HU. In both models, the average gamma passing rates within all volumes of interest were higher than 95% using a 2%, 2 mm criterion, and 99% using a 3%, 3 mm criterion. The average differences in the mean dose and DVH metrics were within +/-0.6% for the planning target volume and within +/-0.15% for evaluated organs in both models. Results demonstrated that abdominal sCT images generated by both cGAN and cycleGAN achieved accurate dose calculation for 8 liver radiotherapy plans. sCTcGAN images had smaller average MAE and achieved better dose calculation accuracy than sCTcyleGAN images. More abdominal patients will be enrolled in the future to further evaluate two models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access