Paper detail

A New Semi-Empirical Model for Cosmic Ray Muon Flux Estimation

Cosmic ray muons have emerged as a non-conventional high-energy radiation probe to monitor dense and large objects. Muons are the most abundant cosmic radiation on Earth, however, their flux at sea level is approximately 10,000 min^-1m^-2 much less than that of induced radiation. In addition, cosmic ray muon flux depends on not only various natural conditions (e.g., zenith angle, altitude, or solar activities) but also the geometric characteristic of detectors. Since the low muon flux typically results in long measurement times, an accurate estimation of measurable muon counts is important for muon applications. Here we propose a simple and versatile semi-empirical model to improve the accuracy in muon flux estimation at all zenith angles by incorporating the geometric parameters of detectors, and we name this the Effective Solid Angle model. To demonstrate the functionality, our model is compared with i) the cosine-squared, ii) PARMA model, and iii) Monte-Carlo simulations, and iv) measurements. Our results show that the muon count rate estimation capability is significantly improved resulting in increasing a mean C/E from 0.7 to 0.95. By selecting an appropriate intensity correlation, the model can be easily extended to estimate muon flux at various altitude and underground level.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.