Paper detail

A Linux Kernel Scheduler Extension for Multi-core Systems

The Linux kernel is mostly designed for multi-programed environments, but high-performance applications have other requirements. Such applications are run standalone, and usually rely on runtime systems to distribute the application's workload on worker threads, one per core. However, due to current OSes limitations, it is not feasible to track whether workers are actually running or blocked due to, for instance, a requested resource. For I/O intensive applications, this leads to a significant performance degradation given that the core of a blocked thread becomes idle until it is able to run again. In this paper, we present the proof-of-concept of a Linux kernel extension denoted User-Monitored Threads (UMT) which tackles this problem. Our extension allows a user-space process to be notified of when the selected threads become blocked or unblocked, making it possible for a runtime to schedule additional work on the idle core. We implemented the extension on the Linux Kernel 5.1 and adapted the Nanos6 runtime of the OmpSs-2 programming model to take advantage of it. The whole prototype was tested on two applications which, on the tested hardware and the appropriate conditions, reported speedups of almost 2x.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.