Paper detail

A Laboratory Study of Absorbing Capacity of Water Vapor at the Wavelengths from 6500 TO 10500 Å

We obtained laboratory spectra of absorption by water vapor at the wavelengths 6500-10500 Å with the multipass cell. The water vapor content along the line of view varied from 0.1 to 3.0 cm of precipitated water, the pressure from 0.1 to 1.0 atm. The spectra were taken with the width of the exit slit of the spectrophotometer 25, 50, 100, and 150 Å. To match these spectra, we selected empirical functions, which approximate the observed absorption within the indicated interval of water vapor content and pressure with the accuracy about 1%. For the water vapor band at the wavelengths regions 7200, 8200, and 9300 Å, with the step 25 Å, we determined the parameters necessary for the calculation of empirical transmission functions. The presented data make it possible to select the parameters for taking into account the radiation attenuation in the spectral region of telluric water vapor under the conditions of real astronomical observations for a specific place and spectrophotometer. The suggested set of empirical parameters may provide correction of observed stellar spectra for the extinction in the atmosphere with the accuracy 0.m01-0.m02.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.