Paper detail

A Kiefer-Wolfowitz type of result in a general setting, with an application to smooth monotone estimation

We consider Grenander type estimators for monotone functions $f$ in a very general setting, which includes estimation of monotone regression curves, monotone densities, and monotone failure rates. These estimators are defined as the left-hand slope of the least concave majorant $\hat{F}_n$ of a naive estimator $F_n$ of the integrated curve $F$ corresponding to $f$. We prove that the supremum distance between $\hat{F}_n$ and $F_n$ is of the order $O_p(n^{-1}\log n)^{2/(4-τ)}$, for some $τ\in[0,4)$ that characterizes the tail probabilities of an approximating process for $F_n$. In typical examples, the approximating process is Gaussian and $τ=1$, in which case the convergence rate is $n^{-2/3}(\log n)^{2/3}$ is in the same spirit as the one obtained by Kiefer and Wolfowitz (1976) for the special case of estimating a decreasing density. We also obtain a similar result for the primitive of $F_n$, in which case $τ=2$, leading to a faster rate $n^{-1}\log n$, also found by Wang and Woodfroofe (2007). As an application in our general setup, we show that a smoothed Grenander type estimator and its derivative are asymptotically equivalent to the ordinary kernel estimator and its derivative in first order.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.