Paper detail

A Consistent Picture of Charge Distribution in Reduced Ceria Phases

We consider the implications of the bond valence model (BVM) description of charge distribution in reduced ceria phases (CeO$_{2-x}$)\cite{Shoko2009,Shoko2009b} to the models used to describe electronic and ionic conductivity in these phases. We conclude that the BVM is consistent with both the small polaron model (SPM) and the atomistic models which describe the electronic and ionic conductivities respectively. For intermediate phases, i.e., $x \sim 0.3$, we suggest the possibility of low temperature metallic conductivity. This has not yet been experimentally observed. We contrast the BVM results and the conventional description of charge distribution in reduced ceria phases.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.