Paper detail

A comparison study on the growth pattern of traffic oscillations in car-following experiments

The evolution of oscillations is a very important issue in traffic flow studies. A recent car-following experiment (Experiment-I) showed that the speed standard deviation grows in a concave way along a platoon of vehicles following one another. This finding indicates that the traditional traffic instability mechanism is debatable, in which the speed standard deviation initially grows in a convex way. This paper has investigated the growth pattern of traffic oscillations in another car-following experiment (Experiment-II) and compared it with that in Experiment-I. It is shown that the speed standard deviation also exhibits concave growth characteristics in Experiment-II. The paired-sample t-test and the Mann-Kendall (MK) trend test showed that there is no significant difference between the two datasets. However, the acceleration standard deviation was remarkably larger in Experiment-II since drivers were asked to follow closely. Furthermore, a comparison experiment has been performed which indicates that the set of experiments on a circular track can be considered equivalent to that on a straight track. Our study is expected to shed light not only on traffic flow dynamics itself but also on the future design of the experiment scheme.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.