Paper detail

A-Collapsibility of Distribution Dependence and Quantile Regression Coefficients

The Yule-Simpson paradox notes that an association between random variables can be reversed when averaged over a background variable. Cox and Wermuth (2003) introduced the concept of distribution dependence between two random variables X and Y, and developed two dependence conditions, each of which guarantees that reversal cannot occur. Ma, Xie and Geng (2006) studied the collapsibility of distribution dependence over a background variable W, under a rather strong homogeneity condition. Collapsibility ensures the association remains the same for conditional and marginal models, so that Yule-Simpson reversal cannot occur. In this paper, we investigate a more general condition for avoiding effect reversal: A-collapsibility. The conditions of Cox and Wermuth imply A-collapsibility, without assuming homogeneity. In fact, we show that, when W is a binary variable, collapsibility is equivalent to A-collapsibility plus homogeneity, and A-collapsibility is equivalent to the conditions of Cox and Wermuth. Recently, Cox (2007) extended Cochran's result on regression coefficients of conditional and marginal models, to quantile regression coefficients. The conditions of Cox and Wermuth are sufficient for A-collapsibility of quantile regression coefficients. If the conditional distribution of W, given Y = y and X = x, belong to one-dimensional natural exponential family, they are also necessary. Some applications of A-collapsibility include the analysis of a contingency table, linear regression models and quantile regression models.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.