Paper detail

$A^{3}D$: A Platform of Searching for Robust Neural Architectures and Efficient Adversarial Attacks

The robustness of deep neural networks (DNN) models has attracted increasing attention due to the urgent need for security in many applications. Numerous existing open-sourced tools or platforms are developed to evaluate the robustness of DNN models by ensembling the majority of adversarial attack or defense algorithms. Unfortunately, current platforms do not possess the ability to optimize the architectures of DNN models or the configuration of adversarial attacks to further enhance the robustness of models or the performance of adversarial attacks. To alleviate these problems, in this paper, we first propose a novel platform called auto adversarial attack and defense ($A^{3}D$), which can help search for robust neural network architectures and efficient adversarial attacks. In $A^{3}D$, we employ multiple neural architecture search methods, which consider different robustness evaluation metrics, including four types of noises: adversarial noise, natural noise, system noise, and quantified metrics, resulting in finding robust architectures. Besides, we propose a mathematical model for auto adversarial attack, and provide multiple optimization algorithms to search for efficient adversarial attacks. In addition, we combine auto adversarial attack and defense together to form a unified framework. Among auto adversarial defense, the searched efficient attack can be used as the new robustness evaluation to further enhance the robustness. In auto adversarial attack, the searched robust architectures can be utilized as the threat model to help find stronger adversarial attacks. Experiments on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and ImageNet datasets demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed platform, which can also provide a benchmark and toolkit for researchers in the application of automated machine learning in evaluating and improving the DNN model robustnesses.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.