Graph explorer

Structure or Noise?

We show how rate-distortion theory provides a mechanism for automated theory building by naturally distinguishing between regularity and randomness. We start from the simple principle that model variables should, as much as possible, render the future and past conditionally independent. From this, we construct an objective function for model making whose extrema embody the trade-off between a model's structural complexity and its predictive power. The solutions correspond to a hierarchy of models that, at each level of complexity, achieve optimal predictive power at minimal cost. In the limit of maximal prediction the resulting optimal model identifies a process's intrinsic organization by extracting the underlying causal states. In this limit, the model's complexity is given by the statistical complexity, which is known to be minimal for achieving maximum prediction. Examples show how theory building can profit from analyzing a process's causal compressibility, which is reflected in the optimal models' rate-distortion curve--the process's characteristic for optimally balancing structure and noise at different levels of representation.

11 nodes18 linksoverview mapStructure or Noise?
11 nodes18 links
Structure or Noise?11 visible / 11 total nodes / 19 links
Related contextRelated contextRelated contextRelated contextRelated contextCo-authorshipRelated contextAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalTopic signalRelated contextRelated contextWStructure or Noise?preprint / 2008ASusanne StillResearcherAJames P. CrutchfieldResearcherTMachine Learning49008 worksTmath-ph7974 worksTmath.MP7972 worksTcond-mat.stat-mech6570 worksTInformation Theory6710 worksTmath.IT6610 worksTmath.ST3384 worksTStatistics Theory3281 works
PaperSignal 1010 links

Structure or Noise?

preprint / 2008

Open