BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ziqiao Ao

Ziqiao Ao contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computationecon.GNMachine LearningMethodologyq-fin.EC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Skill requirements in job advertisements: A comparison of skill-categorization methods based on explanatory power in wage regressions

In this paper, we compare different methods to extract skill requirements from job advertisements. We consider three top-down methods that are based on expert-created dictionaries of keywords, and a bottom-up method of unsupervised topic modeling, the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model. We measure the skill requirements based on these methods using a U.K. dataset of job advertisements that contains over 1 million entries. We estimate the returns of the identified skills using wage regressions. Finally, we compare the different methods by the wage variation they can explain, assuming that better-identified skills will explain a higher fraction of the wage variation in the labor market. We find that the top-down methods perform worse than the LDA model, as they can explain only about 20% of the wage variation, while the LDA model explains about 45% of it.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Inverse Gaussian Process regression for likelihood-free inference

In this work we consider Bayesian inference problems with intractable likelihood functions. We present a method to compute an approximate of the posterior with a limited number of model simulations. The method features an inverse Gaussian Process regression (IGPR), i.e., one from the output of a simulation model to the input of it. Within the method, we provide an adaptive algorithm with a tempering procedure to construct the approximations of the marginal posterior distributions. With examples we demonstrate that IGPR has a competitive performance compared to some commonly used algorithms, especially in terms of statistical stability and computational efficiency, while the price to pay is that it can only compute a weighted Gaussian approximation of the marginal posteriors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An approximate KLD based experimental design for models with intractable likelihoods

Data collection is a critical step in statistical inference and data science, and the goal of statistical experimental design (ED) is to find the data collection setup that can provide most information for the inference. In this work we consider a special type of ED problems where the likelihoods are not available in a closed form. In this case, the popular information-theoretic Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) based design criterion can not be used directly, as it requires to evaluate the likelihood function. To address the issue, we derive a new utility function, which is a lower bound of the original KLD utility. This lower bound is expressed in terms of the summation of two or more entropies in the data space, and thus can be evaluated efficiently via entropy estimation methods. We provide several numerical examples to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access