BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Zhiqiang Tan

Zhiqiang Tan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Methodologymath.STStatistics TheoryComputationMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

High-dimensional model-assisted inference for treatment effects with multi-valued treatments

Consider estimation of average treatment effects with multi-valued treatments using augmented inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimators, depending on outcome regression and propensity score models in high-dimensional settings. These regression models are often fitted by regularized likelihood-based estimation, while ignoring how the fitted functions are used in the subsequent inference about the treatment parameters. Such separate estimation can be associated with known difficulties in existing methods. We develop regularized calibrated estimation for fitting propensity score and outcome regression models, where sparsity-including penalties are employed to facilitate variable selection but the loss functions are carefully chosen such that valid confidence intervals can be obtained under possible model misspecification. Unlike in the case of binary treatments, the usual augmented IPW estimator is generalized by allowing different copies of coefficient estimators in outcome regression to ensure just-identification. For propensity score estimation, the new loss function and estimating functions are directly tied to achieving covariate balance between weighted treatment groups. We develop practical numerical algorithms for computing the regularized calibrated estimators with group Lasso by innovatively exploiting Fisher scoring, and provide rigorous high-dimensional analysis for the resulting augmented IPW estimators under suitable sparsity conditions, while tackling technical issues absent or overlooked in previous analyses. We present simulation studies and an empirical application to estimate the effects of maternal smoking on birth weights. The proposed methods are implemented in the R package mRCAL.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Imputation Maximization Stochastic Approximation with Application to Generalized Linear Mixed Models

Generalized linear mixed models are useful in studying hierarchical data with possibly non-Gaussian responses. However, the intractability of likelihood functions poses challenges for estimation. We develop a new method suitable for this problem, called imputation maximization stochastic approximation (IMSA). For each iteration, IMSA first imputes latent variables/random effects, then maximizes over the complete data likelihood, and finally moves the estimate towards the new maximizer while preserving a proportion of the previous value. The limiting point of IMSA satisfies a self-consistency property and can be less biased in finite samples than the maximum likelihood estimator solved by score-equation based stochastic approximation (ScoreSA). Numerically, IMSA can also be advantageous over ScoreSA in achieving more stable convergence and respecting the parameter ranges under various transformations such as nonnegative variance components. This is corroborated through our simulation studies where IMSA consistently outperforms ScoreSA.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Tractable and Near-Optimal Adversarial Algorithms for Robust Estimation in Contaminated Gaussian Models

Consider the problem of simultaneous estimation of location and variance matrix under Huber's contaminated Gaussian model. First, we study minimum $f$-divergence estimation at the population level, corresponding to a generative adversarial method with a nonparametric discriminator and establish conditions on $f$-divergences which lead to robust estimation, similarly to robustness of minimum distance estimation. More importantly, we develop tractable adversarial algorithms with simple spline discriminators, which can be implemented via nested optimization such that the discriminator parameters can be fully updated by maximizing a concave objective function given the current generator. The proposed methods are shown to achieve minimax optimal rates or near-optimal rates depending on the $f$-divergence and the penalty used. This is the first time such near-optimal error rates are established for adversarial algorithms with linear discriminators under Huber's contamination model. We present simulation studies to demonstrate advantages of the proposed methods over classic robust estimators, pairwise methods, and a generative adversarial method with neural network discriminators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Hamiltonian Assisted Metropolis Sampling

Various Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are studied to improve upon random walk Metropolis sampling, for simulation from complex distributions. Examples include Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithms, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, and other recent algorithms related to underdamped Langevin dynamics. We propose a broad class of irreversible sampling algorithms, called Hamiltonian assisted Metropolis sampling (HAMS), and develop two specific algorithms with appropriate tuning and preconditioning strategies. Our HAMS algorithms are designed to achieve two distinctive properties, while using an augmented target density with momentum as an auxiliary variable. One is generalized detailed balance, which induces an irreversible exploration of the target. The other is a rejection-free property, which allows our algorithms to perform satisfactorily with relatively large step sizes. Furthermore, we formulate a framework of generalized Metropolis--Hastings sampling, which not only highlights our construction of HAMS at a more abstract level, but also facilitates possible further development of irreversible MCMC algorithms. We present several numerical experiments, where the proposed algorithms are found to consistently yield superior results among existing ones.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

High-dimensional Model-assisted Inference for Local Average Treatment Effects with Instrumental Variables

Consider the problem of estimating the local average treatment effect with an instrument variable, where the instrument unconfoundedness holds after adjusting for a set of measured covariates. Several unknown functions of the covariates need to be estimated through regression models, such as instrument propensity score and treatment and outcome regression models. We develop a computationally tractable method in high-dimensional settings where the numbers of regression terms are close to or larger than the sample size. Our method exploits regularized calibrated estimation, which involves Lasso penalties but carefully chosen loss functions for estimating coefficient vectors in these regression models, and then employs a doubly robust estimator for the treatment parameter through augmented inverse probability weighting. We provide rigorous theoretical analysis to show that the resulting Wald confidence intervals are valid for the treatment parameter under suitable sparsity conditions if the instrument propensity score model is correctly specified, but the treatment and outcome regression models may be misspecified. For existing high-dimensional methods, valid confidence intervals are obtained for the treatment parameter if all three models are correctly specified. We evaluate the proposed methods via extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to estimate the returns to education.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Improved minimax estimation of a multivariate normal mean under heteroscedasticity

Consider the problem of estimating a multivariate normal mean with a known variance matrix, which is not necessarily proportional to the identity matrix. The coordinates are shrunk directly in proportion to their variances in Efron and Morris' (J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 68 (1973) 117-130) empirical Bayes approach, whereas inversely in proportion to their variances in Berger's (Ann. Statist. 4 (1976) 223-226) minimax estimators. We propose a new minimax estimator, by approximately minimizing the Bayes risk with a normal prior among a class of minimax estimators where the shrinkage direction is open to specification and the shrinkage magnitude is determined to achieve minimaxity. The proposed estimator has an interesting simple form such that one group of coordinates are shrunk in the direction of Berger's estimator and the remaining coordinates are shrunk in the direction of the Bayes rule. Moreover, the proposed estimator is scale adaptive: it can achieve close to the minimum Bayes risk simultaneously over a scale class of normal priors (including the specified prior) and achieve close to the minimax linear risk over a corresponding scale class of hyper-rectangles. For various scenarios in our numerical study, the proposed estimators with extreme priors yield more substantial risk reduction than existing minimax estimators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Instrumental Variable Estimation When Compliance is not Deterministic: The Stochastic Monotonicity Assumption

The instrumental variables (IV) method is a method for making causal inferences about the effect of a treatment based on an observational study in which there are unmeasured confounding variables. The method requires a valid IV, a variable that is independent of the unmeasured confounding variables and is associated with the treatment but which has no effect on the outcome beyond its effect on the treatment. An additional assumption that is often made for the IV method is deterministic monotonicity, which is an assumption that for each subject, the level of the treatment that a subject would take if given a level of the IV is a monotonic increasing function of the level of the IV. Under deterministic monotonicity, the IV method identifies the average treatment effect for the compliers (those subject who would take the treatment if encouraged to do so by the IV and not take the treatment if not encouraged). However, deterministic monotonicity is sometimes not realistic. We introduce a stochastic monotonicity condition which relaxes deterministic monotonicity in that it does not require that a monotonic increasing relationship hold within subjects between the levels of the IV and the level of the treatment that the subject would take if given a level of the IV, but only that a monotonic increasing relationship hold across subjects between the IV and the treatment in a certain manner. We show that under stochastic monotonicity, the IV method identifies a weighted average of treatment effects with greater weight on subgroups of subjects on whom the IV has a stronger effect. We provide bounds on the global average treatment effect under stochastic monotonicity and a sensitivity analysis for violations of the stochastic monotonicity assumption.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access