BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Zhi Geng

Zhi Geng appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Applicationsmath.STStatistics TheoryMethodologyMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

13works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Assessing Interactive Causes of an Occurred Outcome Due to Two Binary Exposures

In contrast to evaluating treatment effects, causal attribution analysis focuses on identifying the key factors responsible for an observed outcome. For two binary exposure variables and a binary outcome variable, researchers need to assess not only the likelihood that an observed outcome was caused by a particular exposure, but also the likelihood that it resulted from the interaction between the two exposures. For example, in the case of a male worker who smoked, was exposed to asbestos, and developed lung cancer, researchers aim to explore whether the cancer resulted from smoking, asbestos exposure, or their interaction. Even in randomized controlled trials, widely regarded as the gold standard for causal inference, identifying and evaluating retrospective causal interactions between two exposures remains challenging. In this paper, we define posterior probabilities to characterize the interactive causes of an observed outcome. We establish the identifiability of posterior probabilities by using a secondary outcome variable that may appear after the primary outcome. We apply the proposed method to the classic case of smoking and asbestos exposure. Our results indicate that for lung cancer patients who smoked and were exposed to asbestos, the disease is primarily attributable to the synergistic effect between smoking and asbestos exposure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Local Method for Identifying Causal Relations under Markov Equivalence

Causality is important for designing interpretable and robust methods in artificial intelligence research. We propose a local approach to identify whether a variable is a cause of a given target under the framework of causal graphical models of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). In general, the causal relation between two variables may not be identifiable from observational data as many causal DAGs encoding different causal relations are Markov equivalent. In this paper, we first introduce a sufficient and necessary graphical condition to check the existence of a causal path from a variable to a target in every Markov equivalent DAG. Next, we provide local criteria for identifying whether a variable is a cause/non-cause of a target based only on the local structure instead of the entire graph. Finally, we propose a local learning algorithm for this causal query via learning the local structure of the variable and some additional statistical independence tests related to the target. Simulation studies show that our local algorithm is efficient and effective, compared with other state-of-art methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Modeling High-Dimensional Data with Unknown Cut Points: A Fusion Penalized Logistic Threshold Regression

In traditional logistic regression models, the link function is often assumed to be linear and continuous in predictors. Here, we consider a threshold model that all continuous features are discretized into ordinal levels, which further determine the binary responses. Both the threshold points and regression coefficients are unknown and to be estimated. For high dimensional data, we propose a fusion penalized logistic threshold regression (FILTER) model, where a fused lasso penalty is employed to control the total variation and shrink the coefficients to zero as a method of variable selection. Under mild conditions on the estimate of unknown threshold points, we establish the non-asymptotic error bound for coefficient estimation and the model selection consistency. With a careful characterization of the error propagation, we have also shown that the tree-based method, such as CART, fulfill the threshold estimation conditions. We find the FILTER model is well suited in the problem of early detection and prediction for chronic disease like diabetes, using physical examination data. The finite sample behavior of our proposed method are also explored and compared with extensive Monte Carlo studies, which supports our theoretical discoveries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Treatments and Latent Confounders

Causal mediation analysis is used to evaluate direct and indirect causal effects of a treatment on an outcome of interest through an intermediate variable or a mediator.It is difficult to identify the direct and indirect causal effects because the mediator cannot be randomly assigned in many real applications. In this article, we consider a causal model including latent confounders between the mediator and the outcome. We present sufficient conditions for identifying the direct and indirect effects and propose an approach for estimating them. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated by simulation studies. Finally, we apply the approach to a data set of the customer loyalty survey by a telecom company.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Assessing the Treatment Effect Heterogeneity with a Latent Variable

The average treatment effect (ATE) is popularly used to assess the treatment effect. However, the ATE implicitly assumes a homogenous treatment effect even amongst individuals with different characteristics. In this paper, we mainly focus on assessing the treatment effect heterogeneity, which has important implications in designing the optimal individual treatment regimens and in policy making. The treatment benefit rate (TBR) and treatment harm rate (THR) have been defined to characterize the magnitude of heterogeneity for binary outcomes. When the outcomes are continuous, we extend the definitions of the TBR and THR to compare the difference between potential outcomes with a pre-specified level c. Unlike the ATE, these rates involve the joint distribution of the potential outcomes and can not be identified without further assumptions even in randomized clinical trials. In this article, we assume the potential outcomes are independent conditional on the observed covariates and an unmeasured latent variable. Under this assumption, we prove the identification of the TBR and THR in non-separable (generalized) linear models for both continuous and binary outcomes. We then propose estimators and derive their asymptotic distributions. In the simulation studies, we implement our proposed methods to assess the performance of our estimators and carry out a sensitive analysis for different underlying distribution for the latent variable. Finally, we illustrate the proposed methods in two randomized controlled trials.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Causal Network Learning from Multiple Interventions of Unknown Manipulated Targets

In this paper, we discuss structure learning of causal networks from multiple data sets obtained by external intervention experiments where we do not know what variables are manipulated. For example, the conditions in these experiments are changed by changing temperature or using drugs, but we do not know what target variables are manipulated by the external interventions. From such data sets, the structure learning becomes more difficult. For this case, we first discuss the identifiability of causal structures. Next we present a graph-merging method for learning causal networks for the case that the sample sizes are large for these interventions. Then for the case that the sample sizes of these interventions are relatively small, we propose a data-pooling method for learning causal networks in which we pool all data sets of these interventions together for the learning. Further we propose a re-sampling approach to evaluate the edges of the causal network learned by the data-pooling method. Finally we illustrate the proposed learning methods by simulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Novel Criteria to Exclude the Surrogate Paradox and Their Optimalities

When the primary outcome is hard to collect, surrogate endpoint is typically used as a substitute. However, even when the treatment has a positive average causal effect (ACE) on the surrogate endpoint, which also has a positive ACE on the primary outcome, it is still possible that the treatment has a negative ACE on the primary outcome. Such a phenomenon is called the surrogate paradox and greatly challenges the use of surrogate. In this paper, we provide novel criteria to exclude the surrogate paradox. Unlike other conditions previously proposed, our conditions are testable since they only involve observed data. Furthermore, our criteria are optimal in the sense that they are sufficient and "almost necessary" to exclude the paradox: if the conditions are satisfied, the surrogate paradox is guaranteed to be absent while if the conditions fail, there exists a data generating process with surrogate paradox that can generate the same observed data. That is, our criteria capture all the information in the observed data to exclude the surrogate paradox rather than relying on unverifiable distributional assumptions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Identifiability of Normal and Normal Mixture Models With Nonignorable Missing Data

Missing data problems arise in many applied research studies. They may jeopardize statistical inference of the model of interest, if the missing mechanism is nonignorable, that is, the missing mechanism depends on the missing values themselves even conditional on the observed data. With a nonignorable missing mechanism, the model of interest is often not identifiable without imposing further assumptions. We find that even if the missing mechanism has a known parametric form, the model is not identifiable without specifying a parametric outcome distribution. Although it is fundamental for valid statistical inference, identifiability under nonignorable missing mechanisms is not established for many commonly-used models. In this paper, we first demonstrate identifiability of the normal distribution under monotone missing mechanisms. We then extend it to the normal mixture and $t$ mixture models with non-monotone missing mechanisms. We discover that models under the Logistic missing mechanism are less identifiable than those under the Probit missing mechanism. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for identifiability of models under the Logistic missing mechanism, which sometimes can be checked in real data analysis. We illustrate our methods using a series of simulations, and apply them to a real-life dataset.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Principal causal effect identification and surrogate endpoint evaluation by multiple trials

Principal stratification is a causal framework to analyze randomized experiments with a post-treatment variable between the treatment and endpoint variables. Because the principal strata defined by the potential outcomes of the post-treatment variable are not observable, we generally cannot identify the causal effects within principal strata. Motivated by a real data set of phase III adjuvant colon clinical trials, we propose approaches to identifying and estimating the principal causal effects via multiple trials. For the identifiability, we remove the commonly-used exclusion restriction assumption by stipulating that the principal causal effects are homogeneous across these trials. To remove another commonly-used monotonicity assumption, we give a necessary condition for the local identifiability, which requires at least three trials. Applying our approaches to the data from adjuvant colon clinical trials, we find that the commonly-used monotonicity assumption is untenable, and disease-free survival with three-year follow-up is a valid surrogate endpoint for overall survival with five-year follow-up, which satisfies both the causal necessity and the causal sufficiency. We also propose a sensitivity analysis approach based on Bayesian hierarchical models to investigate the impact of the deviation from the homogeneity assumption.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Identifiability of Subgroup Causal Effects in Randomized Experiments with Nonignorable Missing Covariates

Although randomized experiments are widely regarded as the gold standard for estimating causal effects, missing data of the pretreatment covariates makes it challenging to estimate the subgroup causal effects. When the missing data mechanism of the covariates is nonignorable, the parameters of interest are generally not pointly identifiable, and we can only get bounds for the parameters of interest, which may be too wide for practical use. In some real cases, we have prior knowledge that some restrictions may be plausible. We show the identifiability of the causal effects and joint distributions for four interpretable missing data mechanisms, and evaluate the performance of the statistical inference via simulation studies. One application of our methods to a real data set from a randomized clinical trial shows that one of the nonignorable missing data mechanisms fits better than the ignorable missing data mechanism, and the results conform to the study's original expert opinions. We also illustrate the potential applications of our methods to observational studies using a data set from a job-training program.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Qualitative Evaluation of Associations by the Transitivity of the Association Signs

We say that the signs of association measures among three variables {X, Y, Z} are transitive if a positive association measure between the variable X and the intermediate variable Y and further a positive association measure between Y and the endpoint variable Z imply a positive association measure between X and Z. We introduce four association measures with different stringencies, and discuss conditions for the transitivity of the signs of these association measures. When the variables follow exponential family distributions, the conditions become simpler and more interpretable. Applying our results to two data sets from an observational study and a randomized experiment, we demonstrate that the results can help us to draw conclusions about the signs of the association measures between X and Z based only on two separate studies about {X, Y} and {Y, Z}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Semiparametric Inference of the Complier Average Causal Effect with Nonignorable Missing Outcomes

Noncompliance and missing data often occur in randomized trials, which complicate the inference of causal effects. When both noncompliance and missing data are present, previous papers proposed moment and maximum likelihood estimators for binary and normally distributed continuous outcomes under the latent ignorable missing data mechanism. However, the latent ignorable missing data mechanism may be violated in practice, because the missing data mechanism may depend directly on the missing outcome itself. Under noncompliance and an outcome-dependent nonignorable missing data mechanism, previous studies showed the identifiability of complier average causal effect for discrete outcomes. In this paper, we study the semiparametric identifiability and estimation of complier average causal effect in randomized clinical trials with both all-or-none noncompliance and the outcome-dependent nonignorable missing continuous outcomes, and propose a two-step maximum likelihood estimator in order to eliminate the infinite dimensional nuisance parameter. Our method does not need to specify a parametric form for the missing data mechanism. We also evaluate the finite sample property of our method via extensive simulation studies and sensitivity analysis, with an application to a double-blinded psychiatric clinical trial.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Learning local directed acyclic graphs based on multivariate time series data

Multivariate time series (MTS) data such as time course gene expression data in genomics are often collected to study the dynamic nature of the systems. These data provide important information about the causal dependency among a set of random variables. In this paper, we introduce a computationally efficient algorithm to learn directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) based on MTS data, focusing on learning the local structure of a given target variable. Our algorithm is based on learning all parents (P), all children (C) and some descendants (D) (PCD) iteratively, utilizing the time order of the variables to orient the edges. This time series PCD-PCD algorithm (tsPCD-PCD) extends the previous PCD-PCD algorithm to dependent observations and utilizes composite likelihood ratio tests (CLRTs) for testing the conditional independence. We present the asymptotic distribution of the CLRT statistic and show that the tsPCD-PCD is guaranteed to recover the true DAG structure when the faithfulness condition holds and the tests correctly reject the null hypotheses. Simulation studies show that the CLRTs are valid and perform well even when the sample sizes are small. In addition, the tsPCD-PCD algorithm outperforms the PCD-PCD algorithm in recovering the local graph structures. We illustrate the algorithm by analyzing a time course gene expression data related to mouse T-cell activation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access