Researcher profile

Zengjing Chen

Zengjing Chen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Approximate optimality and the risk/reward tradeoff in a class of bandit problems

This paper studies a sequential decision problem where payoff distributions are known and where the riskiness of payoffs matters. Equivalently, it studies sequential choice from a repeated set of independent lotteries. The decision-maker is assumed to pursue strategies that are approximately optimal for large horizons. By exploiting the tractability afforded by asymptotics, conditions are derived characterizing when specialization in one action or lottery throughout is asymptotically optimal and when optimality requires intertemporal diversification. The key is the constancy or variability of risk attitude. The main technical tool is a new central limit theorem.

preprint2022arXiv

A Central Limit Theorem, Loss Aversion and Multi-Armed Bandits

This paper studies a multi-armed bandit problem where the decision-maker is loss averse, in particular she is risk averse in the domain of gains and risk loving in the domain of losses. The focus is on large horizons. Consequences of loss aversion for asymptotic (large horizon) properties are derived in a number of analytical results. The analysis is based on a new central limit theorem for a set of measures under which conditional variances can vary in a largely unstructured history-dependent way subject only to the restriction that they lie in a fixed interval.

preprint2022arXiv

A Confirmation of a Conjecture on the Feldman's Two-armed Bandit Problem

Myopic strategy is one of the most important strategies when studying bandit problems. In this paper, we consider the two-armed bandit problem proposed by Feldman. With general distributions and utility functions, we obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for the optimality of the myopic strategy. As an application, we could solve Nouiehed and Ross's conjecture for Bernoulli two-armed bandit problems that myopic strategy stochastically maximizes the number of wins.

preprint2022arXiv

Strategy-Driven Limit Theorems Associated Bandit Problems

Motivated by the study of asymptotic behaviour of the bandit problems, we obtain several strategy-driven limit theorems including the law of large numbers, the large deviation principle, and the central limit theorem. Different from the classical limit theorems, we develop sampling strategy-driven limit theorems that generate the maximum or minimum average reward. The law of large numbers identifies all possible limits that are achievable under various strategies. The large deviation principle provides the maximum decay probabilities for deviations from the limiting domain. To describe the fluctuations around averages, we obtain strategy-driven central limit theorems under optimal strategies. The limits in these theorem are identified explicitly, and depend heavily on the structure of the events or the integrating functions and strategies. This demonstrates the key signature of the learning structure. Our results can be used to estimate the maximal (minimal) rewards, and to identify the conditions of avoiding the Parrondo's paradox in the two-armed bandit problem. It also lays the theoretical foundation for statistical inference in determining the arm that offers the higher mean reward.