BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Zafar Ahmed contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We explore the relationships between scattering states and bound states of different non-analytic segments (depending on $|x|$) of the exponential potential, and elucidate the status of the special scattering states found in an earlier publication by Ahmed et al. A similar analysis can be made of non-analytic segments of power potentials such as $x^3$.
Probability of reflection $R(E)$ off a finite attractive scattering potential at zero or low energies is ordinarily supposed to be 1. However, a fully attractive potential presents a paradoxical result that $R(0)=0$ or $R(0)<1$, when an effective parameter $q$ of the potential admits special discrete values. Here, we report another class of finite potentials which are well-barrier (attractive-repulsive) type and which can be made to possess much less reflection at zero and low energies for a band of low values of $q$. These well-barrier potentials have only two real turning points for $E \in(V_{min}, V_{max})$, excepting $E=0$. We present two exactly solvable and two numerically solved models to confirm this phenomenon.
We point out that PT-symmetric potentials $V_{PT}(x)$ having imaginary asymptotic saturation: $V_{PT}(x=\pm \infty) =\pm i V_1, V_1 \in \Re$ are devoid of scattering states and spectral singularity. We show the existence of real (positive and negative) discrete spectrum both with and without complex conjugate pair(s) of eigenvalues (CCPEs). If the states are arranged in the ascending order or real part of discrete eigenvalues, the initial states have few nodes but latter ones oscillate fast. Both real and imaginary parts of $ψ(x)$ vanish asymptotically, $|ψ(x)|$ for the CCPEs are asymmetric and for real energies these are symmetric about origin. For CCPEs $E_{\pm}$ the eigenstates $ψ_{\pm}$ follow an interesting property that $|ψ_+(x)|= N |ψ_-(-x)|, N \in \Re^+$. We remark that, the fast oscillating real discrete energy states discussed are likely to be confused with: reflectionless states, one dimensional version of von Neumann states of Hermitian and spectral singularity state of complex PT-symmetric potentials.
We point out that a non-overlapping well (at negative energies) adjacent to a finite barrier (at positive energies) is a simple potential which is generally missed out while discussing the one-dimensional potentials in the textbooks of quantum mechanics. We show that these systems present interesting situations wherein transmitivity $(T_b(E))$ of a finite barrier can be changed both quantitatively and qualitatively by varying the depth or width of the well or by changing the distance between the well and the barrier. Using delta (thin) well near a delta (thin) barrier we show that the well induces energy oscillations riding over $T_b(E)$ in the transmitivity $T(E)$ at both the energies below and above the barrier. More generally we show that a thick well separated from a thick barrier also gives rise to energy oscillations in $T(E)$. A well joining a barrier discontinuously (a finite jump) reduces $T(E)$ (as compared to $T_b(E))$ over all energies. When the well and barrier are joined continuously, $T(E)$ increases and then decreases at energies below the barrier. At energy above the the barrier the changes are inappreciable. In these two cases if we separate the well and the barrier by a distance, $T(E)$ again acquires oscillations. Paradoxically, it turns out that a distant well induces more energy oscillations in $T(E)$ than when it is near the barrier.