Researcher profile

Yuedong Wang

Yuedong Wang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Sequential Kalman filter for fast online changepoint detection in longitudinal health records

This article introduces the sequential Kalman filter, a computationally scalable approach for online changepoint detection with temporally correlated data. The temporal correlation was not considered in the Bayesian online changepoint detection approach due to the large computational cost. Motivated by detecting COVID-19 infections for dialysis patients from massive longitudinal health records with a large number of covariates, we develop a scalable approach to detect multiple changepoints from correlated data by sequentially stitching Kalman filters of subsequences to compute the joint distribution of the observations, which has linear computational complexity with respect to the number of observations between the last detected changepoint and the current observation at each time point, without approximating the likelihood function. Compared to other online changepoint detection methods, simulated experiments show that our approach is more precise in detecting single or multiple changes in mean, variance, or correlation for temporally correlated data. Furthermore, we propose a new way to integrate classification and changepoint detection approaches that improve the detection delay and accuracy for detecting COVID-19 infection compared to other alternatives.

preprint2020arXiv

Fixed-effects model: the most convincing model for meta-analysis with few studies

According to Davey et al. (2011) with a total of 22,453 meta-analyses from the January 2008 Issue of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the median number of studies included in each meta-analysis is only three. In other words, about a half or more of meta-analyses conducted in the literature include only two or three studies. While the common-effect model (also referred to as the fixed-effect model) may lead to misleading results when the heterogeneity among studies is large, the conclusions based on the random-effects model may also be unreliable when the number of studies is small. Alternatively, the fixed-effects model avoids the restrictive assumption in the common-effect model and the need to estimate the between-study variance in the random-effects model. We note, however, that the fixed-effects model is under appreciated and rarely used in practice until recently. In this paper, we compare all three models and demonstrate the usefulness of the fixed-effects model when the number of studies is small. In addition, we propose a new estimator for the unweighted average effect in the fixed-effects model. Simulations and real examples are also used to illustrate the benefits of the fixed-effects model and the new estimator.