BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Tiejun Tong

Tiejun Tong appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
MethodologyApplicationsmath.STStatistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Pairwise Hotelling Method for Testing High-Dimensional Mean Vectors

For high-dimensional small sample size data, Hotelling's T2 test is not applicable for testing mean vectors due to the singularity problem in the sample covariance matrix. To overcome the problem, there are three main approaches in the literature. Note, however, that each of the existing approaches may have serious limitations and only works well in certain situations. Inspired by this, we propose a pairwise Hotelling method for testing high-dimensional mean vectors, which, in essence, provides a good balance between the existing approaches. To effectively utilize the correlation information, we construct the new test statistics as the summation of Hotelling's test statistics for the covariate pairs with strong correlations and the squared $t$ statistics for the individual covariates that have little correlation with others. We further derive the asymptotic null distributions and power functions for the proposed Hotelling tests under some regularity conditions. Numerical results show that our new tests are able to control the type I error rates, and can achieve a higher statistical power compared to existing methods, especially when the covariates are highly correlated. Two real data examples are also analyzed and they both demonstrate the efficacy of our pairwise Hotelling tests.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fixed-effects model: the most convincing model for meta-analysis with few studies

According to Davey et al. (2011) with a total of 22,453 meta-analyses from the January 2008 Issue of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the median number of studies included in each meta-analysis is only three. In other words, about a half or more of meta-analyses conducted in the literature include only two or three studies. While the common-effect model (also referred to as the fixed-effect model) may lead to misleading results when the heterogeneity among studies is large, the conclusions based on the random-effects model may also be unreliable when the number of studies is small. Alternatively, the fixed-effects model avoids the restrictive assumption in the common-effect model and the need to estimate the between-study variance in the random-effects model. We note, however, that the fixed-effects model is under appreciated and rarely used in practice until recently. In this paper, we compare all three models and demonstrate the usefulness of the fixed-effects model when the number of studies is small. In addition, we propose a new estimator for the unweighted average effect in the fixed-effects model. Simulations and real examples are also used to illustrate the benefits of the fixed-effects model and the new estimator.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary

When reporting the results of clinical studies, some researchers may choose the five-number summary (including the sample median, the first and third quartiles, and the minimum and maximum values) rather than the sample mean and standard deviation, particularly for skewed data. For these studies, when included in a meta-analysis, it is often desired to convert the five-number summary back to the sample mean and standard deviation. For this purpose, several methods have been proposed in the recent literature and they are increasingly used nowadays. In this paper, we propose to further advance the literature by developing a smoothly weighted estimator for the sample standard deviation that fully utilizes the sample size information. For ease of implementation, we also derive an approximation formula for the optimal weight, as well as a shortcut formula for the sample standard deviation. Numerical results show that our new estimator provides a more accurate estimate for normal data and also performs favorably for non-normal data. Together with the optimal sample mean estimator in Luo et al., our new methods have dramatically improved the existing methods for data transformation, and they are capable to serve as "rules of thumb" in meta-analysis for studies reported with the five-number summary. Finally for practical use, an Excel spreadsheet and an online calculator are also provided for implementing our optimal estimators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range and/or mid-quartile range

The era of big data is coming, and evidence-based medicine is attracting increasing attention to improve decision making in medical practice via integrating evidence from well designed and conducted clinical research. Meta-analysis is a statistical technique widely used in evidence-based medicine for analytically combining the findings from independent clinical trials to provide an overall estimation of a treatment effectiveness. The sample mean and standard deviation are two commonly used statistics in meta-analysis but some trials use the median, the minimum and maximum values, or sometimes the first and third quartiles to report the results. Thus, to pool results in a consistent format, researchers need to transform those information back to the sample mean and standard deviation. In this paper, we investigate the optimal estimation of the sample mean for meta-analysis from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. A major drawback in the literature is that the sample size, needless to say its importance, is either ignored or used in a stepwise but somewhat arbitrary manner, e.g., the famous method proposed by Hozo et al. We solve this issue by incorporating the sample size in a smoothly changing weight in the estimators to reach the optimal estimation. Our proposed estimators not only improve the existing ones significantly but also share the same virtue of the simplicity. The real data application indicates that our proposed estimators are capable to serve as "rules of thumb" and will be widely applied in evidence-based medicine.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

SIMEX estimation for single-index model with covariate measurement error

In this paper, we consider the single-index measurement error model with mismeasured covariates in the nonparametric part. To solve the problem, we develop a simulation-extrapolation (SIMEX) algorithm based on the local linear smoother and the estimating equation. For the proposed SIMEX estimation, it is not needed to assume the distribution of the unobserved covariate. We transform the boundary of a unit ball in $\mathbb{R}^p$ to the interior of a unit ball in $\mathbb{R}^{p-1}$ by using the constraint $\|β\|=1$. The proposed SIMEX estimator of the index parameter is shown to be asymptotically normal under some regularity conditions. We also derive the asymptotic bias and variance of the estimator of the unknown link function. Finally, the performance of the proposed method is examined by simulation studies and is illustrated by a real data example.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

NBLDA: Negative Binomial Linear Discriminant Analysis for RNA-Seq Data

RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) has become a powerful technology to characterize gene expression profiles because it is more accurate and comprehensive than microarrays. Although statistical methods that have been developed for microarray data can be applied to RNA-Seq data, they are not ideal due to the discrete nature of RNA-Seq data. The Poisson distribution and negative binomial distribution are commonly used to model count data. Recently, Witten (2011) proposed a Poisson linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data. The Poisson assumption may not be as appropriate as negative binomial distribution when biological replicates are available and in the presence of overdispersion (i.e., when the variance is larger than the mean). However, it is more complicated to model negative binomial variables because they involve a dispersion parameter that needs to be estimated. In this paper, we propose a negative binomial linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data. By Bayes' rule, we construct the classifier by fitting a negative binomial model, and propose some plug-in rules to estimate the unknown parameters in the classifier. The relationship between the negative binomial classifier and the Poisson classifier is explored, with a numerical investigation of the impact of dispersion on the discriminant score. Simulation results show the superiority of our proposed method. We also analyze four real RNA-Seq data sets to demonstrate the advantage of our method in real-world applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Non-parametric shrinkage mean estimation for quadratic loss functions with unknown covariance matrices

In this paper, a shrinkage estimator for the population mean is proposed under known quadratic loss functions with unknown covariance matrices. The new estimator is non-parametric in the sense that it does not assume a specific parametric distribution for the data and it does not require the prior information on the population covariance matrix. Analytical results on the improvement of the proposed shrinkage estimator are provided and some corresponding asymptotic properties are also derived. Finally, we demonstrate the practical improvement of the proposed method over existing methods through extensive simulation studies and real data analysis. Keywords: High-dimensional data; Shrinkage estimator; Large $p$ small $n$; $U$-statistic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Optimal variance estimation without estimating the mean function

We study the least squares estimator in the residual variance estimation context. We show that the mean squared differences of paired observations are asymptotically normally distributed. We further establish that, by regressing the mean squared differences of these paired observations on the squared distances between paired covariates via a simple least squares procedure, the resulting variance estimator is not only asymptotically normal and root-$n$ consistent, but also reaches the optimal bound in terms of estimation variance. We also demonstrate the advantage of the least squares estimator in comparison with existing methods in terms of the second order asymptotic properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access