Source author record

Yu-Heng Lin

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
2topics
3close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Roles of scalar mesons in charmless ΛbΛ_b decays

We first study the charmless two-body ΛbΛ_b decays with the scalar mesons as the final states and predict that B(Λb→Λf0(980,1500))=(2.9±0.7,12.4±3.8)×10−6{\cal B}(Λ_b\to Λf_0(980,1500))=(2.9\pm 0.7,12.4\pm 3.8)\times 10^{-6} and B(Λb→pK0∗−(800,1430))=(1.9±0.5,14.1±4.5)×10−6{\cal B}(Λ_b\to p K^{*-}_0(800,1430))=(1.9\pm 0.5,14.1\pm 4.5)\times 10^{-6}. With the resonant f0(980,1500)→(π+π−,K+K−)f_0(980,1500)\to (π^+π^-,K^+K^-) and K0∗−→Kˉ0π−K^{*-}_0\to \bar K^0 π^- decays, we then obtain B(Λb→Λ(π+π−,K+K−))=(4.2±1.0,3.5±0.7)×10−6{\cal B}(Λ_b\to Λ(π^+π^-,K^+K^-))=(4.2\pm 1.0,3.5\pm0.7)\times 10^{-6} and B(Λb→pKˉ0π−)=(10.4±2.9)×10−6{\cal B}(Λ_b\to p\bar K^0 π^-)=(10.4\pm2.9)\times 10^{-6}, in comparison with the data of (4.6±1.9,15.9±2.6)×10−6(4.6\pm 1.9,15.9\pm2.6)\times 10^{-6} and (12.6±4.0)×10−6(12.6\pm 4.0)\times 10^{-6} from LHCb, respectively. Our results for Λb→Λπ+π−Λ_b\to Λπ^+π^- and Λb→pKˉ0π−Λ_b\to p\bar K^0 π^- would be regarded as the first evidences of the scalar meson productions in the anti-triplet bb-baryon decays. The smaller predicted value of B(Λb→ΛK+K−){\cal B}(Λ_b\to ΛK^+K^-) indicates the existences of other resonant contributions to the decay, such as Λb→K−(N∗+→)ΛK+Λ_b\to K^-(N^{*+}\to)ΛK^+.

preprint2016arXiv

Study of Λb→Λ(ϕ,η(′))Λ_b\to Λ(ϕ,η^{(\prime)}) and Λb→ΛK+K−Λ_b\to ΛK^+K^- decays

We study the charmless two-body Λb→Λ(ϕ,η(′))Λ_b\to Λ(ϕ,η^{(\prime)}) and three-body Λb→ΛK+K−Λ_b\to ΛK^+K^- decays. We obtain B(Λb→Λϕ)=(3.53±0.24)×10−6{\cal B}(Λ_b\to Λϕ)=(3.53\pm 0.24)\times 10^{-6} to agree with the recent LHCb measurement. However, we find that B(Λb→Λ(ϕ→)K+K−)=(1.71±0.12)×10−6{\cal B}(Λ_b\to Λ(ϕ\to)K^+ K^-)=(1.71\pm 0.12)\times 10^{-6} is unable to explain the LHCb observation of B(Λb→ΛK+K−)=(15.9±1.2±1.2±2.0)×10−6{\cal B}(Λ_b\toΛK^+ K^-)=(15.9\pm 1.2\pm 1.2\pm 2.0)\times 10^{-6}, which implies the possibility for other contributions, such as that from the resonant Λb→K−N∗, N∗→ΛK+Λ_b\to K^- N^*,\,N^*\toΛK^+ decay with N∗N^* as a higher-wave baryon state. For Λb→Λη(′)Λ_b\to Λη^{(\prime)}, we show that B(Λb→Λη, Λη′)=(1.47±0.35,1.83±0.58)×10−6{\cal B}(Λ_b\to Λη,\,Λη^\prime)= (1.47\pm 0.35,1.83\pm 0.58)\times 10^{-6}, which are consistent with the current data of (9.3−5.3+7.3,<3.1)×10−6(9.3^{+7.3}_{-5.3},<3.1)\times 10^{-6}, respectively. Our results also support the relation of B(Λb→Λη)≃B(Λb→Λη′){\cal B}(Λ_b\to Λη) \simeq {\cal B}(Λ_b\toΛη^\prime), given by the previous study.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.