BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yoonkyung Lee

Yoonkyung Lee contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine Learningmath.STMethodologyStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Measuring Model Complexity in Heteroscedastic Linear Regression

Heteroscedasticity is common in real world applications and is often handled by incorporating case weights into a modeling procedure. Intuitively, models fitted with different weight schemes would have a different level of complexity depending on how well the weights match the inverse of error variances. However, existing statistical theories on model complexity, also known as model degrees of freedom, were primarily established under the assumption of equal error variances. In this work, we focus on linear regression procedures and seek to extend the existing measures to a heteroscedastic setting. Our analysis of the weighted least squares method reveals some interesting properties of the extended measures. In particular, we find that they depend on both the weights used for model fitting and those for model evaluation. Moreover, modeling heteroscedastic data with optimal weights generally results in fewer degrees of freedom than with equal weights, and the size of reduction depends on the unevenness of error variance. This provides additional insights into weighted modeling procedures that are useful in risk estimation and model selection.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Predictive Model Degrees of Freedom in Linear Regression

Overparametrized interpolating models have drawn increasing attention from machine learning. Some recent studies suggest that regularized interpolating models can generalize well. This phenomenon seemingly contradicts the conventional wisdom that interpolation tends to overfit the data and performs poorly on test data. Further, it appears to defy the bias-variance trade-off. As one of the shortcomings of the existing theory, the classical notion of model degrees of freedom fails to explain the intrinsic difference among the interpolating models since it focuses on estimation of in-sample prediction error. This motivates an alternative measure of model complexity which can differentiate those interpolating models and take different test points into account. In particular, we propose a measure with a proper adjustment based on the squared covariance between the predictions and observations. Our analysis with least squares method reveals some interesting properties of the measure, which can reconcile the "double descent" phenomenon with the classical theory. This opens doors to an extended definition of model degrees of freedom in modern predictive settings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Geometry of Nonlinear Embeddings in Kernel Discriminant Analysis

Fisher's linear discriminant analysis is a classical method for classification, yet it is limited to capturing linear features only. Kernel discriminant analysis as an extension is known to successfully alleviate the limitation through a nonlinear feature mapping. We study the geometry of nonlinear embeddings in discriminant analysis with polynomial kernels and Gaussian kernel by identifying the population-level discriminant function that depends on the data distribution and the kernel. In order to obtain the discriminant function, we solve a generalized eigenvalue problem with between-class and within-class covariance operators. The polynomial discriminants are shown to capture the class difference through the population moments explicitly. For approximation of the Gaussian discriminant, we use a particular representation of the Gaussian kernel by utilizing the exponential generating function for Hermite polynomials. We also show that the Gaussian discriminant can be approximated using randomized projections of the data. Our results illuminate how the data distribution and the kernel interact in determination of the nonlinear embedding for discrimination, and provide a guideline for choice of the kernel and its parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Bayesian Restricted Likelihood Methods: Conditioning on Insufficient Statistics in Bayesian Regression

Bayesian methods have proven themselves to be successful across a wide range of scientific problems and have many well-documented advantages over competing methods. However, these methods run into difficulties for two major and prevalent classes of problems: handling data sets with outliers and dealing with model misspecification. We outline the drawbacks of previous solutions to both of these problems and propose a new method as an alternative. When working with the new method, the data is summarized through a set of insufficient statistics, targeting inferential quantities of interest, and the prior distribution is updated with the summary statistics rather than the complete data. By careful choice of conditioning statistics, we retain the main benefits of Bayesian methods while reducing the sensitivity of the analysis to features of the data not captured by the conditioning statistics. For reducing sensitivity to outliers, classical robust estimators (e.g., M-estimators) are natural choices for conditioning statistics. A major contribution of this work is the development of a data augmented Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm for the linear model and a large class of summary statistics. We demonstrate the method on simulated and real data sets containing outliers and subject to model misspecification. Success is manifested in better predictive performance for data points of interest as compared to competing methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Dimensionality Reduction for Binary Data through the Projection of Natural Parameters

Principal component analysis (PCA) for binary data, known as logistic PCA, has become a popular alternative to dimensionality reduction of binary data. It is motivated as an extension of ordinary PCA by means of a matrix factorization, akin to the singular value decomposition, that maximizes the Bernoulli log-likelihood. We propose a new formulation of logistic PCA which extends Pearson's formulation of a low dimensional data representation with minimum error to binary data. Our formulation does not require a matrix factorization, as previous methods do, but instead looks for projections of the natural parameters from the saturated model. Due to this difference, the number of parameters does not grow with the number of observations and the principal component scores on new data can be computed with simple matrix multiplication. We derive explicit solutions for data matrices of special structure and provide computationally efficient algorithms for solving for the principal component loadings. Through simulation experiments and an analysis of medical diagnoses data, we compare our formulation of logistic PCA to the previous formulation as well as ordinary PCA to demonstrate its benefits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access