Researcher profile

Yo'av Rieck

Yo'av Rieck contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
11works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Structure Theorem for Bad 3-Orbifolds

We explicitly construct a collection of bad 3-orbifolds, \(\mathcal{X}\), satisfying the following properties: \begin{enumerate} \item The underlying topological space of any \(X \in \mathcal{X}\) is homeomorphic to $S^2\times I$ or $(S^2\times S^1)\backslash B^3$. \item The boundary of any \(X \in \mathcal{X}\) consists of one or two spherical 2-orbifolds. \item Any bad 3-orbifold is obtained from a good 3-orbifold by repeating, finitely many times, the following operation: remove one or two orbifold-balls, and glue in some \(X \in \mathcal{X}\). \end{enumerate} Conversely, any bad 3-orbifold \(\OO\) contains some \(X \in \mathcal{X}\) as a sub-orbifold; we call removing \(X\) and capping the resulting boundary \em cut-and-cap.\em\ Then by cutting-and-capping finitely many times we obtain a good orbifold.

preprint2022arXiv

Strongly aperiodic SFTs on hyperbolic groups: where to find them and why we love them

D. B. Cohen, C. Goodman-Strauss, and the author proved that a hyperbolic group admits an "SA SFT" if and only if it has at most one end. This paper has two distinct parts: the first is a conversation explaining what an SA SFT is and how they may be of use. In the second part I attempt to explain both old and new ideas that go into the proof. References to specific claims in the original paper are given, with the hope that any interested reader may be able to find the details there more accessible after reading this exposition.

preprint2015arXiv

The spectrum of the growth rate of the tunnel number is infinite

In a previous paper Kobayashi and Rieck defined the growth rate of the tunnel number of a knot $K$, a knot invariant that measures the asymptotic behavior of the tunnel number under iterated connected sum of $K$. We denote the growth rate by $\mbox{gr}_t(K)$. In this paper we construct, for any $ε> 0$, a hyperbolic knots $K \subset S^{3}$ for which $1 - ε< \mbox{gr}_t(K) < 1$. This is the first proof that the spectrum of the growth rate of the tunnel number is infinite.

preprint2014arXiv

Strong cylindricality and the monodromy of bundles

A surface $F$ in a 3-manifold $M$ is called cylindrical if $M$ cut open along $F$ admits an essential annulus $A$. If, in addition, $(A, \partial A)$ is embedded in $(M, F)$, then we say that $F$ is strongly cylindrical. Let $M$ be a connected 3-manifold that admits a triangulation using $t$ tetrahedra and $F$ a two-sided connected essential closed surface of genus $g(F)$. We show that if $g(F)$ is at least $38 t$, then $F$ is strongly cylindrical. As a corollary, we give an alternative proof of the assertion that every closed hyperbolic 3-manifold admits only finitely many fibrations over the circle with connected fiber whose translation distance is not one, which was originally proved by Saul Schleimer.

preprint2013arXiv

Hyperbolic volume and Heegaard distance

We prove (Theorem~1.5) that there exists a constant $Λ> 0$ so that if $M$ is a $(μ,d)$-generic complete hyperbolic 3-manifold of volume $\vol[M] < \infty$ and $Σ\subset M$ is a Heegaard surface of genus $g(Σ) > Λ\vol[M]$, then $d(Σ) \leq 2$, where $d(Σ)$ denotes the distance of $Σ$ as defined by Hempel. The key for the proof of the main result is Theorem~1.8 which is on independent interest. There we prove that if $M$ is a compact 3-manifold that can be triangulated using at most $t$ tetrahedra (possibly with missing or truncated vertices), and $Σ$ is a Heegaard surface for $M$ with $g(Σ) \geq 76t+26$, then $d(Σ) \leq 2$.

preprint2012arXiv

A linear bound on the tetrahedral number of manifolds of bounded volume (after Jorgensen and Thurston)

We provide a detailed proof of the following folklore theorem: Let mu > 0 be a Margulis constant for 3-dimensional hyperbolic space. Then for any d>0 there exists a constant K>0, depending on mu and d, so that for any complete finite volume hyperbolic 3-manifold M, the d-neighborhood of the mu-thick part of M can be triangulated using at most K Vol(M) tetrahedra; here Vol is the hyperbolic volume function. As a corollary, we obtain the following topological interpretation of the volume: the minimal number of tetrahedra required to triangulate a link exterior in M is linearly equivalent to Vol(M); for a precise statement see Corollary 1.3.

preprint2012arXiv

The Link Volume of 3-Manifolds

We view closed orientable 3-manifolds as covers of S^3 branched over hyperbolic links. For a p-fold cover M \to S^3, branched over a hyperbolic link L, we assign the complexity p Vol(S^3 minus L) (where Vol is the hyperbolic volume). We define an invariant of 3-manifolds, called the link volume and denoted LV, that assigns to a 3-manifold M the infimum of the complexities of all possible covers M \to S^3, where the only constraint is that the branch set is a hyperbolic link. Thus the link volume measures how efficiently M can be represented as a cover of S^3. We study the basic properties of the link volume and related invariants, in particular observing that for any hyperbolic manifold M, Vol(M) < LV(M). We prove a structure theorem that is similar to (and relies on) the celebrated theorem of Jorgensen and Thurston. This leads us to conjecture that, generically, the link volume of a hyperbolic 3-manifold is much bigger than its volume. Finally we prove that the link volumes of the manifolds obtained by Dehn filling a manifold with boundary tori are linearly bounded above in terms of the length of the continued fraction expansion of the filling curves.

preprint2012arXiv

The Link Volumes of some prism manifolds

In arxiv:1205.1274 Rieck and Yamashita defined the link volume of 3-manifolds and studied some of its basic properties. Many of these properties are similar to the corresponding properties of the hyperbolic volume. In this paper we calculate the link volume of an infinite family of prism manifolds. As a corollary, we show that (in contrast to the hyperbolic volume) the link volume is not finite-to-one.

preprint2010arXiv

Invariant Heegaard Surfaces in Manifolds with Involutions and the Heegaard Genus of Double Covers

Let M be a 3-manifold admitting a strongly irreducible Heegaard surface S and f:M \to M an involution. We construct an invariant Heegaard surface for M of genus at most 8 g(S) - 7. As a consequence, given a (possibly branched) double cover π:M \to N we obtain the following bound on the Heegaard genus of N: g(N) \leq 4g(S) - 3. We also get a bound on the complexity of the branch set in terms of g(S). If we assume that M is non-Haken, by Casson and Gordon we may replace g(S) by g(M) in all the statements above.

preprint2009arXiv

Finite planar emulators for K_{4,5} - 4K_2 and K_{1,2,2,2} and Fellows&#39; Conjecture

In 1988 Fellows conjectured that if a finite, connected graph admits a finite planar emulator, then it admits a finite planar cover. We construct a finite planar emulator for K_{4,5} - 4K_2. Archdeacon showed that K_{4,5} - 4K_2 does not admit a finite planar cover; thus K_{4,5} - 4K_2 provides a counterexample to Fellows&#39; Conjecture. It is known that Negami&#39;s Planar Cover Conjecture is true if and only if K_{1,2,2,2} admits no finite planar cover. We construct a finite planar emulator for K_{1,2,2,2}. The existence of a finite planar cover for K_{1,2,2,2} is still open.