Researcher profile

Yinchu Zhu

Yinchu Zhu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Inference for Low-Rank Models

This paper studies inference in linear models with a high-dimensional parameter matrix that can be well-approximated by a ``spiked low-rank matrix.'' A spiked low-rank matrix has rank that grows slowly compared to its dimensions and nonzero singular values that diverge to infinity. We show that this framework covers a broad class of models of latent-variables which can accommodate matrix completion problems, factor models, varying coefficient models, and heterogeneous treatment effects. For inference, we apply a procedure that relies on an initial nuclear-norm penalized estimation step followed by two ordinary least squares regressions. We consider the framework of estimating incoherent eigenvectors and use a rotation argument to argue that the eigenspace estimation is asymptotically unbiased. Using this framework we show that our procedure provides asymptotically normal inference and achieves the semiparametric efficiency bound. We illustrate our framework by providing low-level conditions for its application in a treatment effects context where treatment assignment might be strongly dependent.

preprint2022arXiv

Can Two Forecasts Have the Same Conditional Expected Accuracy?

The approach for testing equal predictive accuracy for pairs of forecasting models proposed by Giacomini and White (2006) assumes that the parameters of the underlying forecasting models are estimated using a rolling window of fixed width and incorporates the effect of parameter estimation in the null hypothesis. We show that a necessary and sufficient condition for the conditionally expected loss differential of two forecasting models to be a martingale difference sequence is that the outcome is a simple average of the two forecasts. When the forecasts contain parameter estimation errors, this means that the conditional mean of the outcome has to be a function of past estimation errors--a condition that fails in many situations. We also show that the null can fail even in the absence of parameter estimation for many types of stochastic processes in common use.

preprint2022arXiv

Optimal data-driven hiring with equity for underrepresented groups

We present a data-driven prescriptive framework for fair decisions, motivated by hiring. An employer evaluates a set of applicants based on their observable attributes. The goal is to hire the best candidates while avoiding bias with regard to a certain protected attribute. Simply ignoring the protected attribute will not eliminate bias due to correlations in the data. We present a hiring policy that depends on the protected attribute functionally, but not statistically, and we prove that, among all possible fair policies, ours is optimal with respect to the firm's objective. We test our approach on both synthetic and real data, and find that it shows great practical potential to improve equity for underrepresented and historically marginalized groups.

preprint2021arXiv

An Exact and Robust Conformal Inference Method for Counterfactual and Synthetic Controls

We introduce new inference procedures for counterfactual and synthetic control methods for policy evaluation. We recast the causal inference problem as a counterfactual prediction and a structural breaks testing problem. This allows us to exploit insights from conformal prediction and structural breaks testing to develop permutation inference procedures that accommodate modern high-dimensional estimators, are valid under weak and easy-to-verify conditions, and are provably robust against misspecification. Our methods work in conjunction with many different approaches for predicting counterfactual mean outcomes in the absence of the policy intervention. Examples include synthetic controls, difference-in-differences, factor and matrix completion models, and (fused) time series panel data models. Our approach demonstrates an excellent small-sample performance in simulations and is taken to a data application where we re-evaluate the consequences of decriminalizing indoor prostitution. Open-source software for implementing our conformal inference methods is available.

preprint2021arXiv

Distributional conformal prediction

We propose a robust method for constructing conditionally valid prediction intervals based on models for conditional distributions such as quantile and distribution regression. Our approach can be applied to important prediction problems including cross-sectional prediction, k-step-ahead forecasts, synthetic controls and counterfactual prediction, and individual treatment effects prediction. Our method exploits the probability integral transform and relies on permuting estimated ranks. Unlike regression residuals, ranks are independent of the predictors, allowing us to construct conditionally valid prediction intervals under heteroskedasticity. We establish approximate conditional validity under consistent estimation and provide approximate unconditional validity under model misspecification, overfitting, and with time series data. We also propose a simple "shape" adjustment of our baseline method that yields optimal prediction intervals.

preprint2019arXiv

Testability of high-dimensional linear models with non-sparse structures

Understanding statistical inference under possibly non-sparse high-dimensional models has gained much interest recently. For a given component of the regression coefficient, we show that the difficulty of the problem depends on the sparsity of the corresponding row of the precision matrix of the covariates, not the sparsity of the regression coefficients. We develop new concepts of uniform and essentially uniform non-testability that allow the study of limitations of tests across a broad set of alternatives. Uniform non-testability identifies a collection of alternatives such that the power of any test, against any alternative in the group, is asymptotically at most equal to the nominal size. Implications of the new constructions include new minimax testability results that, in sharp contrast to the current results, do not depend on the sparsity of the regression parameters. We identify new tradeoffs between testability and feature correlation. In particular, we show that, in models with weak feature correlations, minimax lower bound can be attained by a test whose power has the $\sqrt{n}$ rate, regardless of the size of the model sparsity.