BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yin-Jie Li

Yin-Jie Li contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.HEgr-qcastro-ph.SR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Verification of the Black Hole Area Law with GW230814

We present an observational confirmation of Hawking's black-hole area theorem using the newly released gravitational-wave data from the GWTC-4.0. We analyze the high signal-to-noise ratio binary black hole (BBH) merger GW230814 and measure the (total) horizon area of the black holes before and after the merger. For preferred (and reasonable) choices of the post-truncation start time, the horizon area of the remnant black hole is found to be greater than the total horizon area of the two pre-merger black holes at a high possibility (at least $\gtrsim 99.5\%$). Importantly, our analysis accounts for sky-location uncertainty. These results provide a stringent observational confirmation of the black-hole area law, further bolstering the validity of classical general relativity in the dynamical, strong-field regime.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Potential Subpopulations and Assembling Tendency of the Merging Black Holes

The origins of coalescing binary black holes (BBHs) detected by the advanced LIGO/Virgo are still under debate, and clues may be present in the joint mass-spin distribution of these merger events. Here we construct phenomenological models containing two sub-populations to investigate the BBH population detected in gravitational wave observations. We find that our models can explain the GWTC-3 data rather well, and several constraints to our model are required by the data: first, the maximum mass for the component with a stellar-origin, $m_{\rm max}$, is $39.1^{+2.4}_{-2.7}M_{\odot}$ at 90\% credibility; second, about $15\%$ of the mergers happen in dynamical environments, in which $7-16\%$ of events are hierarchical mergers, and these BHs have an average spin magnitude significantly larger than the first-generation mergers, with ${\rm d}μ_{\rm a} > 0.4 $ at $99\%$ credibility; third, the dynamical component BHs tend to pair with each other with larger total mass and higher mass ratio. An independent analysis focusing on spins is also carried out, and we find that the spin amplitude of component BHs can be divided into two groups according to a division mass $m_{\rm d} = 46.1^{+5.6}_{-5.1}M_{\odot}$. These constraints can be naturally explained by current formation channels, and our results suggest that some of the observed events were likely from AGN disks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Divergence in mass ratio distributions between low-mass and high-mass coalescing binary black holes

Coalescing binary black hole (BBH) systems are likely formed via several channels, and it is challenging to understand their formation / evolutionary processes. Some features in the mass function of the primary components ($m_1$), such as the distinct Gaussian-like peak located at $\sim 34M_\odot$, have been previously found. In this work, we investigate the possible dependence of the mass ratio ($q=m_2/m_1$) distribution on the primary mass. We find a Bayesian odds ratio of 18.1 in favor of divergence in the mass ratio distributions between the low- and high-mass ranges over an invariable mass ratio distribution. The BBHs with $m_1\gtrsim29M_{\odot}$ have a stronger preference to be symmetric compared to those with $m_1\lesssim29M_{\odot}$ at a 97.6\% credible level. Additionally, we find mild evidence that the BBHs with $m_1$ located in the Gaussian-like peak have a mass ratio distribution different from that of other BBHs. Our findings may be in favor of some formation channels, such as the chemically homogeneous evolution and the dynamical assembly in globular clusters/nuclear star clusters, which are more likely to provide symmetric BBHs in the high-mass range.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Is GW190425 consistent with being a neutron star$-$black hole merger?

GW190425 is the second neutron star merger event detected by the Advanced LIGO/Virgo detectors. If interpreted as a double neutron star merger, the total gravitational mass is substantially larger than that of the binary systems identified in the Galaxy. In this work we analyze the gravitational-wave data within the neutron star$-$black hole merger scenario. For the black hole, we yield a mass of $2.40^{+0.36}_{-0.32}M_\odot$ and an aligned spin of $0.141^{+0.067}_{-0.064}$. As for the neutron star we find a mass of $1.15^{+0.15}_{-0.13}M_\odot$ and the dimensionless tidal deformability of $1.4^{+3.8}_{-1.2}\times 10^{3}$. These parameter ranges are for 90\% credibility. The inferred masses of the neutron star and the black hole are not in tension with current observations and we suggest that GW190425 is a viable candidate of a neutron star$-$black hole merger event. Benefitting from the continual enhancement of the sensitivities of the advanced gravitational detectors and the increase of the number of the observatories, similar events are anticipated to be much more precisely measured in the future and the presence of black holes below the so-called mass gap will be unambiguously clarified. If confirmed, the mergers of neutron stars with (quickly rotating) low-mass black holes are likely important production sites of the heaviest r-process elements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The roles of individual advanced LIGO detectors on revealing the neutron star properties

In this work we re-analyze the data of GW170817, the first binary neutron star (BNS) merger event, in two ways, including the parameterized equation of state (EoS) method and gravitational wave (GW) parameter estimation analysis. Three sets of data, including the combined LIGO/Virgo (HLV) data, the LIGO-Hanford (H1) data and the LIGO-Livingston (L1) data, have been analyzed, respectively. We confirm the bimodal probability distribution of the tidal deformability of GW170817 with the HLV data and resolve the different contributions of H1 and L1 detectors. Our simulation reveals a tendency of ``overestimating" the tidal parameter with the decreasing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Such a tendency is likely caused by the dependence of the result on the prior (which is not well understood and has been assumed to be widely-distributed) in the low SNR case. Though this effect is interesting, the slightly higher SNR of H1 than L1 at frequencies above $\sim 100$ Hz is most-likely not the main reason for the lower tidal parameter region favored by H1. In view of the large fluctuation of the expected tide parameter in the case of low SNR, the different probability distributions favored by the L1 and H1 data of GW170817 are reasonable. We have also explored the dependence of expected difference of SNRs of H1 and L1 detectors on the source locations in the O3 and full sensitivity runs. Such maps are helpful in evaluating the relative powers of individual detectors on measuring the tidal deformabilities for the new double neutron star merger events.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access