Paper detail

The roles of individual advanced LIGO detectors on revealing the neutron star properties

In this work we re-analyze the data of GW170817, the first binary neutron star (BNS) merger event, in two ways, including the parameterized equation of state (EoS) method and gravitational wave (GW) parameter estimation analysis. Three sets of data, including the combined LIGO/Virgo (HLV) data, the LIGO-Hanford (H1) data and the LIGO-Livingston (L1) data, have been analyzed, respectively. We confirm the bimodal probability distribution of the tidal deformability of GW170817 with the HLV data and resolve the different contributions of H1 and L1 detectors. Our simulation reveals a tendency of ``overestimating" the tidal parameter with the decreasing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Such a tendency is likely caused by the dependence of the result on the prior (which is not well understood and has been assumed to be widely-distributed) in the low SNR case. Though this effect is interesting, the slightly higher SNR of H1 than L1 at frequencies above $\sim 100$ Hz is most-likely not the main reason for the lower tidal parameter region favored by H1. In view of the large fluctuation of the expected tide parameter in the case of low SNR, the different probability distributions favored by the L1 and H1 data of GW170817 are reasonable. We have also explored the dependence of expected difference of SNRs of H1 and L1 detectors on the source locations in the O3 and full sensitivity runs. Such maps are helpful in evaluating the relative powers of individual detectors on measuring the tidal deformabilities for the new double neutron star merger events.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.