Paper detail

Potential Subpopulations and Assembling Tendency of the Merging Black Holes

The origins of coalescing binary black holes (BBHs) detected by the advanced LIGO/Virgo are still under debate, and clues may be present in the joint mass-spin distribution of these merger events. Here we construct phenomenological models containing two sub-populations to investigate the BBH population detected in gravitational wave observations. We find that our models can explain the GWTC-3 data rather well, and several constraints to our model are required by the data: first, the maximum mass for the component with a stellar-origin, $m_{\rm max}$, is $39.1^{+2.4}_{-2.7}M_{\odot}$ at 90\% credibility; second, about $15\%$ of the mergers happen in dynamical environments, in which $7-16\%$ of events are hierarchical mergers, and these BHs have an average spin magnitude significantly larger than the first-generation mergers, with ${\rm d}μ_{\rm a} > 0.4 $ at $99\%$ credibility; third, the dynamical component BHs tend to pair with each other with larger total mass and higher mass ratio. An independent analysis focusing on spins is also carried out, and we find that the spin amplitude of component BHs can be divided into two groups according to a division mass $m_{\rm d} = 46.1^{+5.6}_{-5.1}M_{\odot}$. These constraints can be naturally explained by current formation channels, and our results suggest that some of the observed events were likely from AGN disks.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.