BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Yichen Qin

Yichen Qin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.STMethodologyStatistics TheoryApplicationsComputation

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Testing for Treatment Effect in Covariate-Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trials with Generalized Linear Models and Omitted Covariates

Concerns have been expressed over the validity of statistical inference under covariate-adaptive randomization despite the extensive use in clinical trials. In the literature, the inferential properties under covariate-adaptive randomization have been mainly studied for continuous responses; in particular, it is well known that the usual two sample t-test for treatment effect is typically conservative, in the sense that the actual test size is smaller than the nominal level. This phenomenon of invalid tests has also been found for generalized linear models without adjusting for the covariates and are sometimes more worrisome due to inflated Type I error. The purpose of this study is to examine the unadjusted test for treatment effect under generalized linear models and covariate-adaptive randomization. For a large class of covariate-adaptive randomization methods, we obtain the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis and derive the conditions under which the test is conservative, valid, or anti-conservative. Several commonly used generalized linear models, such as logistic regression and Poisson regression, are discussed in detail. An adjustment method is also proposed to achieve a valid size based on the asymptotic results. Numerical studies confirm the theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed adjustment method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Statistical Inference for Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Procedures

Covariate-adaptive randomization (CAR) procedures are frequently used in comparative studies to increase the covariate balance across treatment groups. However, because randomization inevitably uses the covariate information when forming balanced treatment groups, the validity of classical statistical methods after such randomization is often unclear. In this article, we derive the theoretical properties of statistical methods based on general CAR under the linear model framework. More importantly, we explicitly unveil the relationship between covariate-adaptive and inference properties by deriving the asymptotic representations of the corresponding estimators. We apply the proposed general theory to various randomization procedures such as complete randomization, rerandomization, pairwise sequential randomization, and Atkinson's $D_A$-biased coin design and compare their performance analytically. Based on the theoretical results, we then propose a new approach to obtain valid and more powerful tests. These results open a door to understand and analyze experiments based on CAR. Simulation studies provide further evidence of the advantages of the proposed framework and the theoretical results. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Robust Hypothesis Testing via Lq-Likelihood

This article introduces a robust hypothesis testing procedure: the Lq-likelihood-ratio-type test (LqRT). By deriving the asymptotic distribution of this test statistic, the authors demonstrate its robustness both analytically and numerically, and they investigate the properties of both its influence function and its breakdown point. A proposed method to select the tuning parameter q offers a good efficiency/robustness trade-off, compared with the traditional likelihood ratio test (LRT) and other robust tests. A simulation and real data analysis provides further evidence of the advantages of the proposed LqRT method. In particular, for the special case of testing the location parameter in the presence of gross error contamination, the LqRT dominates the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and the sign test at various levels of contamination.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Variable Selection with Scalable Bootstrap in Generalized Linear Model for Massive Data

Bootstrap is commonly used as a tool for non-parametric statistical inference to estimate meaningful parameters in Variable Selection Models. However, for massive dataset that has exponential growth rate, the computation of Bootstrap Variable Selection (BootVS) can be a crucial issue. In this paper, we propose the method of Variable Selection with Bag of Little Bootstraps (BLBVS) on General Linear Regression and extend it to Generalized Linear Model for selecting important parameters and assessing the quality of estimators' computation efficiency by analyzing results of multiple bootstrap sub-samples. The introduced method best suits large datasets which have parallel and distributed computing structures. To test the performance of BLBVS, we compare it with BootVS from different aspects via empirical studies. The results of simulations show our method has excellent performance. A real data analysis, Risk Forecast of Credit Cards, is also presented to illustrate the computational superiority of BLBVS on large scale datasets, and the result demonstrates the usefulness and validity of our proposed method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access