BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Feifang Hu

Feifang Hu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodologymath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Testing for Treatment Effect in Covariate-Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trials with Generalized Linear Models and Omitted Covariates

Concerns have been expressed over the validity of statistical inference under covariate-adaptive randomization despite the extensive use in clinical trials. In the literature, the inferential properties under covariate-adaptive randomization have been mainly studied for continuous responses; in particular, it is well known that the usual two sample t-test for treatment effect is typically conservative, in the sense that the actual test size is smaller than the nominal level. This phenomenon of invalid tests has also been found for generalized linear models without adjusting for the covariates and are sometimes more worrisome due to inflated Type I error. The purpose of this study is to examine the unadjusted test for treatment effect under generalized linear models and covariate-adaptive randomization. For a large class of covariate-adaptive randomization methods, we obtain the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis and derive the conditions under which the test is conservative, valid, or anti-conservative. Several commonly used generalized linear models, such as logistic regression and Poisson regression, are discussed in detail. An adjustment method is also proposed to achieve a valid size based on the asymptotic results. Numerical studies confirm the theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed adjustment method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Adaptive Randomization in Network Data

Network data have appeared frequently in recent research. For example, in comparing the effects of different types of treatment, network models have been proposed to improve the quality of estimation and hypothesis testing. In this paper, we focus on efficiently estimating the average treatment effect using an adaptive randomization procedure in networks. We work on models of causal frameworks, for which the treatment outcome of a subject is affected by its own covariate as well as those of its neighbors. Moreover, we consider the case in which, when we assign treatments to the current subject, only the subnetwork of existing subjects is revealed. New randomized procedures are proposed to minimize the mean squared error of the estimated differences between treatment effects. In network data, it is usually difficult to obtain theoretical properties because the numbers of nodes and connections increase simultaneously. Under mild assumptions, our proposed procedure is closely related to a time-varying inhomogeneous Markov chain. We then use Lyapunov functions to derive the theoretical properties of the proposed procedures. The advantages of the proposed procedures are also demonstrated by extensive simulations and experiments on real network data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Cluster-Adaptive Network A/B Testing: From Randomization to Estimation

A/B testing is an important decision-making tool in product development for evaluating user engagement or satisfaction from a new service, feature or product. The goal of A/B testing is to estimate the average treatment effects (ATE) of a new change, which becomes complicated when users are interacting. When the important assumption of A/B testing, the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA), which states that each individual's response is affected by their own treatment only, is not valid, the classical estimate of the ATE usually leads to a wrong conclusion. In this paper, we propose a cluster-adaptive network A/B testing procedure, which involves a sequential cluster-adaptive randomization and a cluster-adjusted estimator. The cluster-adaptive randomization is employed to minimize the cluster-level Mahalanobis distance within the two treatment groups, so that the variance of the estimate of the ATE can be reduced. In addition, the cluster-adjusted estimator is used to eliminate the bias caused by network interference, resulting in a consistent estimation for the ATE. Numerical studies suggest our cluster-adaptive network A/B testing achieves consistent estimation with higher efficiency. An empirical study is conducted based on a real world network to illustrate how our method can benefit decision-making in application.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Theory of Covariate-Adaptive Designs

Pocock and Simon's marginal procedure (Pocock and Simon, 1975) is often implemented forbalancing treatment allocation over influential covariates in clinical trials. However, the theoretical properties of Pocock and Simion's procedure have remained largely elusive for decades. In this paper, we propose a general framework for covariate-adaptive designs and establish the corresponding theory under widely satisfied conditions. As a special case, we obtain the theoretical properties of Pocock and Simon's marginal procedure: the marginal imbalances and overall imbalance are bounded in probability, but the within-stratum imbalances increase with the rate of $\sqrt{n}$ as the sample size increases. The theoretical results provide new insights about balance properties of covariate-adaptive randomization procedures and open a door to study the theoretical properties of statistical inference for clinical trials based on covariate-adaptive randomization procedures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Statistical Inference for Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Procedures

Covariate-adaptive randomization (CAR) procedures are frequently used in comparative studies to increase the covariate balance across treatment groups. However, because randomization inevitably uses the covariate information when forming balanced treatment groups, the validity of classical statistical methods after such randomization is often unclear. In this article, we derive the theoretical properties of statistical methods based on general CAR under the linear model framework. More importantly, we explicitly unveil the relationship between covariate-adaptive and inference properties by deriving the asymptotic representations of the corresponding estimators. We apply the proposed general theory to various randomization procedures such as complete randomization, rerandomization, pairwise sequential randomization, and Atkinson's $D_A$-biased coin design and compare their performance analytically. Based on the theoretical results, we then propose a new approach to obtain valid and more powerful tests. These results open a door to understand and analyze experiments based on CAR. Simulation studies provide further evidence of the advantages of the proposed framework and the theoretical results. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access