BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Feifang Hu

Feifang Hu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.STStatistics TheoryMethodologymath.PR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

9works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Testing for Treatment Effect in Covariate-Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trials with Generalized Linear Models and Omitted Covariates

Concerns have been expressed over the validity of statistical inference under covariate-adaptive randomization despite the extensive use in clinical trials. In the literature, the inferential properties under covariate-adaptive randomization have been mainly studied for continuous responses; in particular, it is well known that the usual two sample t-test for treatment effect is typically conservative, in the sense that the actual test size is smaller than the nominal level. This phenomenon of invalid tests has also been found for generalized linear models without adjusting for the covariates and are sometimes more worrisome due to inflated Type I error. The purpose of this study is to examine the unadjusted test for treatment effect under generalized linear models and covariate-adaptive randomization. For a large class of covariate-adaptive randomization methods, we obtain the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis and derive the conditions under which the test is conservative, valid, or anti-conservative. Several commonly used generalized linear models, such as logistic regression and Poisson regression, are discussed in detail. An adjustment method is also proposed to achieve a valid size based on the asymptotic results. Numerical studies confirm the theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed adjustment method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Adaptive Randomization in Network Data

Network data have appeared frequently in recent research. For example, in comparing the effects of different types of treatment, network models have been proposed to improve the quality of estimation and hypothesis testing. In this paper, we focus on efficiently estimating the average treatment effect using an adaptive randomization procedure in networks. We work on models of causal frameworks, for which the treatment outcome of a subject is affected by its own covariate as well as those of its neighbors. Moreover, we consider the case in which, when we assign treatments to the current subject, only the subnetwork of existing subjects is revealed. New randomized procedures are proposed to minimize the mean squared error of the estimated differences between treatment effects. In network data, it is usually difficult to obtain theoretical properties because the numbers of nodes and connections increase simultaneously. Under mild assumptions, our proposed procedure is closely related to a time-varying inhomogeneous Markov chain. We then use Lyapunov functions to derive the theoretical properties of the proposed procedures. The advantages of the proposed procedures are also demonstrated by extensive simulations and experiments on real network data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Cluster-Adaptive Network A/B Testing: From Randomization to Estimation

A/B testing is an important decision-making tool in product development for evaluating user engagement or satisfaction from a new service, feature or product. The goal of A/B testing is to estimate the average treatment effects (ATE) of a new change, which becomes complicated when users are interacting. When the important assumption of A/B testing, the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA), which states that each individual's response is affected by their own treatment only, is not valid, the classical estimate of the ATE usually leads to a wrong conclusion. In this paper, we propose a cluster-adaptive network A/B testing procedure, which involves a sequential cluster-adaptive randomization and a cluster-adjusted estimator. The cluster-adaptive randomization is employed to minimize the cluster-level Mahalanobis distance within the two treatment groups, so that the variance of the estimate of the ATE can be reduced. In addition, the cluster-adjusted estimator is used to eliminate the bias caused by network interference, resulting in a consistent estimation for the ATE. Numerical studies suggest our cluster-adaptive network A/B testing achieves consistent estimation with higher efficiency. An empirical study is conducted based on a real world network to illustrate how our method can benefit decision-making in application.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Theory of Covariate-Adaptive Designs

Pocock and Simon's marginal procedure (Pocock and Simon, 1975) is often implemented forbalancing treatment allocation over influential covariates in clinical trials. However, the theoretical properties of Pocock and Simion's procedure have remained largely elusive for decades. In this paper, we propose a general framework for covariate-adaptive designs and establish the corresponding theory under widely satisfied conditions. As a special case, we obtain the theoretical properties of Pocock and Simon's marginal procedure: the marginal imbalances and overall imbalance are bounded in probability, but the within-stratum imbalances increase with the rate of $\sqrt{n}$ as the sample size increases. The theoretical results provide new insights about balance properties of covariate-adaptive randomization procedures and open a door to study the theoretical properties of statistical inference for clinical trials based on covariate-adaptive randomization procedures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Statistical Inference for Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Procedures

Covariate-adaptive randomization (CAR) procedures are frequently used in comparative studies to increase the covariate balance across treatment groups. However, because randomization inevitably uses the covariate information when forming balanced treatment groups, the validity of classical statistical methods after such randomization is often unclear. In this article, we derive the theoretical properties of statistical methods based on general CAR under the linear model framework. More importantly, we explicitly unveil the relationship between covariate-adaptive and inference properties by deriving the asymptotic representations of the corresponding estimators. We apply the proposed general theory to various randomization procedures such as complete randomization, rerandomization, pairwise sequential randomization, and Atkinson's $D_A$-biased coin design and compare their performance analytically. Based on the theoretical results, we then propose a new approach to obtain valid and more powerful tests. These results open a door to understand and analyze experiments based on CAR. Simulation studies provide further evidence of the advantages of the proposed framework and the theoretical results. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Asymptotic properties of covariate-adaptive randomization

Balancing treatment allocation for influential covariates is critical in clinical trials. This has become increasingly important as more and more biomarkers are found to be associated with different diseases in translational research (genomics, proteomics and metabolomics). Stratified permuted block randomization and minimization methods [Pocock and Simon Biometrics 31 (1975) 103-115, etc.] are the two most popular approaches in practice. However, stratified permuted block randomization fails to achieve good overall balance when the number of strata is large, whereas traditional minimization methods also suffer from the potential drawback of large within-stratum imbalances. Moreover, the theoretical bases of minimization methods remain largely elusive. In this paper, we propose a new covariate-adaptive design that is able to control various types of imbalances. We show that the joint process of within-stratum imbalances is a positive recurrent Markov chain under certain conditions. Therefore, this new procedure yields more balanced allocation. The advantages of the proposed procedure are also demonstrated by extensive simulation studies. Our work provides a theoretical tool for future research in this area.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Immigrated urn models - asymptotic properties and applications

Urn models have been widely studied and applied in both scientific and social science disciplines. In clinical studies, the adoption of urn models in treatment allocation schemes has been proved to be beneficial to both researchers, by providing more efficient clinical trials, and patients, by increasing the likelihood of receiving the better treatment. In this paper, we propose a new and general class of immigrated urn (IMU) models that incorporates the immigration mechanism into the urn process. Theoretical properties are developed and the advantages of the IMU models are discussed. In general, the IMU models have smaller variabilities than the classical urn models, yielding more powerful statistical inferences in applications. Illustrative examples are presented to demonstrate the wide applicability of the IMU models. The proposed IMU framework, including many popular classical urn models, not only offers a unify perspective for us to comprehend the urn process, but also enables us to generate several novel urn models with desirable properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Sequential monitoring of response-adaptive randomized clinical trials

Clinical trials are complex and usually involve multiple objectives such as controlling type I error rate, increasing power to detect treatment difference, assigning more patients to better treatment, and more. In literature, both response-adaptive randomization (RAR) procedures (by changing randomization procedure sequentially) and sequential monitoring (by changing analysis procedure sequentially) have been proposed to achieve these objectives to some degree. In this paper, we propose to sequentially monitor response-adaptive randomized clinical trial and study it's properties. We prove that the sequential test statistics of the new procedure converge to a Brownian motion in distribution. Further, we show that the sequential test statistics asymptotically satisfy the canonical joint distribution defined in Jennison and Turnbull (\citeyearJT00). Therefore, type I error and other objectives can be achieved theoretically by selecting appropriate boundaries. These results open a door to sequentially monitor response-adaptive randomized clinical trials in practice. We can also observe from the simulation studies that, the proposed procedure brings together the advantages of both techniques, in dealing with power, total sample size and total failure numbers, while keeps the type I error. In addition, we illustrate the characteristics of the proposed procedure by redesigning a well-known clinical trial of maternal-infant HIV transmission.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access