BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Yannai A. Gonczarowski

Yannai A. Gonczarowski appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer Science and Game TheoryDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computingmath.COComputational Complexityecon.THLogic in Computer ScienceMachine LearningMultiagent Systems

Catalog footprint

What is connected

14works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Escaping Cannibalization? Correlation-Robust Pricing for a Unit-Demand Buyer

We consider a robust version of the revenue maximization problem, where a single seller wishes to sell $n$ items to a single unit-demand buyer. In this robust version, the seller knows the buyer's marginal value distribution for each item separately, but not the joint distribution, and prices the items to maximize revenue in the worst case over all compatible correlation structures. We devise a computationally efficient (polynomial in the support size of the marginals) algorithm that computes the worst-case joint distribution for any choice of item prices. And yet, in sharp contrast to the additive buyer case (Carroll, 2017), we show that it is NP-hard to approximate the optimal choice of prices to within any factor better than $n^{1/2-ε}$. For the special case of marginal distributions that satisfy the monotone hazard rate property, we show how to guarantee a constant fraction of the optimal worst-case revenue using item pricing; this pricing equates revenue across all possible correlations and can be computed efficiently.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Matching for the Israeli "Mechinot" Gap-Year Programs: Handling Rich Diversity Requirements

We describe our experience with designing and running a matching market for the Israeli "Mechinot" gap-year programs. The main conceptual challenge in the design of this market was the rich set of diversity considerations, which necessitated the development of an appropriate preference-specification language along with corresponding choice-function semantics, which we also theoretically analyze. Our contribution extends the existing toolbox for two-sided matching with soft constraints. This market was run for the first time in January 2018 and matched 1,607 candidates (out of a total of 3,120 candidates) to 35 different programs, has been run twice more since, and has been adopted by the Joint Council of the "Mechinot" gap-year programs for the foreseeable future.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Playing on a Level Field: Sincere and Sophisticated Players in the Boston Mechanism with a Coarse Priority Structure

Who gains and who loses from a manipulable school-choice mechanism? Studying the outcomes of sincere and sophisticated students under the manipulable Boston Mechanism as compared with the strategy-proof Deferred Acceptance, we provide robust "anything-goes" theorems for large random markets with coarse priority structures. I.e., there are many sincere and sophisticated students who prefer the Boston Mechanism to Deferred Acceptance, and vice versa. Some populations may even benefit from being sincere (if also perceived as such). Our findings reconcile qualitative differences between previous theory and known empirical results. We conclude by studying market forces that can influence the choice between these mechanisms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Complexity of Interactively Learning a Stable Matching by Trial and Error

In a stable matching setting, we consider a query model that allows for an interactive learning algorithm to make precisely one type of query: proposing a matching, the response to which is either that the proposed matching is stable, or a blocking pair (chosen adversarially) indicating that this matching is unstable. For one-to-one matching markets, our main result is an essentially tight upper bound of $O(n^2\log n)$ on the deterministic query complexity of interactively learning a stable matching in this coarse query model, along with an efficient randomized algorithm that achieves this query complexity with high probability. For many-to-many matching markets in which participants have responsive preferences, we first give an interactive learning algorithm whose query complexity and running time are polynomial in the size of the market if the maximum quota of each agent is bounded; our main result for many-to-many markets is that the deterministic query complexity can be made polynomial (more specifically, $O(n^3 \log n)$) in the size of the market even for arbitrary (e.g., linear in the market size) quotas.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

A Hydraulic Approach to Equilibria of Resource Selection Games

Drawing intuition from a (physical) hydraulic system, we present a novel framework, constructively showing the existence of a strong Nash equilibrium in resource selection games (i.e., asymmetric singleton congestion games) with nonatomic players, the coincidence of strong equilibria and Nash equilibria in such games, and the uniqueness of the cost of each given resource across all Nash equilibria. Our proofs allow for explicit calculation of Nash equilibrium and for explicit and direct calculation of the resulting (unique) costs of resources, and do not hinge on any fixed-point theorem, on the Minimax theorem or any equivalent result, on linear programming, or on the existence of a potential (though our analysis does provide powerful insights into the potential, via a natural concrete physical interpretation). A generalization of resource selection games, called resource selection games with I.D.-dependent weighting, is defined, and the results are extended to this family, showing the existence of strong equilibria, and showing that while resource costs are no longer unique across Nash equilibria in games of this family, they are nonetheless unique across all strong Nash equilibria, drawing a novel fundamental connection between group deviation and I.D.-congestion. A natural application of the resulting machinery to a large class of constraint-satisfaction problems is also described.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Unbeatable Set Consensus via Topological and Combinatorial Reasoning

The set consensus problem has played an important role in the study of distributed systems for over two decades. Indeed, the search for lower bounds and impossibility results for this problem spawned the topological approach to distributed computing, which has given rise to new techniques in the design and analysis of protocols. The design of efficient solutions to set consensus has also proven to be challenging. In the synchronous crash failure model, the literature contains a sequence of solutions to set consensus, each improving upon the previous ones. This paper presents an unbeatable protocol for nonuniform k-set consensus in the synchronous crash failure model. This is an efficient protocol whose decision times cannot be improved upon. Moreover, the description of our protocol is extremely succinct. Proving unbeatability of this protocol is a nontrivial challenge. We provide two proofs for its unbeatability: one is a subtle constructive combinatorial proof, and the other is a topological proof of a new style. These two proofs provide new insight into the connection between topological reasoning and combinatorial reasoning about protocols, which has long been a subject of interest. In particular, our topological proof reasons in a novel way about subcomplexes of the protocol complex, and sheds light on an open question posed by Guerraoui and Pochon (2009). Finally, using the machinery developed in the design of this unbeatable protocol, we propose a protocol for uniform k-set consensus that beats all known solutions by a large margin.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Mirage of Market Allocation

Can noncooperative behaviour of merchants lead to a market split that prima facie seems anticompetitive? We introduce a model in which service providers, with ISPs being the main example, aim at optimizing the number of customers using their services, while customers aim at choosing service providers with low customer load (high bandwidth per subscriber, for ISPs). Each service provider chooses between a variety of levels of service (latencies, for ISPs), and as long as it does not lose customers, aims at minimizing its level of service; the minimum level of service required to satisfy a customer varies across customers. We consider a two-stage competition: in the first stage, service providers select their levels of service; in the second stage, customers choose between service providers. In the two-stage game, we show that the competition among service providers possesses a unique Nash equilibrium, which is moreover super-strong; we also show that sequential better-response dynamics of service providers reach this equilibrium, with best-response dynamics doing so surprisingly fast. If service providers choose their levels of service according to this equilibrium, then the unique Nash equilibrium among customers in the second phase is a split of the market between the service providers, based on the customers' minimum acceptable quality of service; moreover, each service provider's chosen level of service is the lowest acceptable by the entirety of its market slice, seemingly making no attempt to attract other customers. Our results show that this prima facie market allocation (collusive split of the market) arises as the unique and highly robust outcome of noncooperative, even myopic, service-provider behaviour. These results are applicable to a wide variety of scenarios, from explaining phenomena observable in food markets, to shedding a surprising light on aspects of location theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

"Secret Santa" and the Combined Length of Spanned Cycles in a Random Permutation

In many schools throughout the United States, it is customary to hold a yearly "Secret Santa" event. With the approach of Christmas, all the students place their names in a hat; each student, in turn, draws a name out of the hat, thus becoming Secret Santa to the student whose name is drawn. On the day before Christmas break, each student places a gift in front of the locker of the student to whom she or he is Secret Santa. Unfortunately, children being children, some students might forget to bring gifts on this day. Students who do not find gifts next to their lockers, feeling cheated, angrily take their gifts back from their recipients, who in turn reclaim their gifts from their recipients, and so forth. We analyze the distribution of the number $L$ of students whose Christmas is ruined, as a function of the number of students who do not bring gifts. We give a simple, explicit formula for the probability of every possible value for $L$ (backed by three proofs of distinct flavors), as well as closed-form formulae for its expectation and variance. Notably, we show that if $m$ kids forget to bring gifts, then the expected fraction of kids whose Christmas is not ruined is less than $\frac{1}{m+1}$ (regardless of the total number of students), with low probability for a large deviation from this fraction. The underlying theoretical results are applicable to the study of manipulation in matching markets within game theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Manipulation of Stable Matchings using Minimal Blacklists

Gale and Sotomayor (1985) have shown that in the Gale-Shapley matching algorithm (1962), the proposed-to side W (referred to as women there) can strategically force the W-optimal stable matching as the M-optimal one by truncating their preference lists, each woman possibly blacklisting all but one man. As Gusfield and Irving have already noted in 1989, no results are known regarding achieving this feat by means other than such preference-list truncation, i.e. by also permuting preference lists. We answer Gusfield and Irving's open question by providing tight upper bounds on the amount of blacklists and their combined size, that are required by the women to force a given matching as the M-optimal stable matching, or, more generally, as the unique stable matching. Our results show that the coalition of all women can strategically force any matching as the unique stable matching, using preference lists in which at most half of the women have nonempty blacklists, and in which the average blacklist size is less than 1. This allows the women to manipulate the market in a manner that is far more inconspicuous, in a sense, than previously realized. When there are less women than men, we show that in the absence of blacklists for men, the women can force any matching as the unique stable matching without blacklisting anyone, while when there are more women than men, each to-be-unmatched woman may have to blacklist as many as all men. Together, these results shed light on the question of how much, if at all, do given preferences for one side a priori impose limitations on the set of stable matchings under various conditions. All of the results in this paper are constructive, providing efficient algorithms for calculating the desired strategies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Unbeatable Consensus

The unbeatability of a consensus protocol, introduced by Halpern, Moses and Waarts in 2001, is a stronger notion of optimality than the accepted notion of early stopping protocols. Using a novel knowledge-based analysis, this paper derives the first practical unbeatable consensus protocols in the literature, for the standard synchronous message-passing model with crash failures. These protocols strictly dominate the best known protocols for uniform and for non-uniform consensus, in some case beating them by a large margin. The analysis provides a new understanding of the logical structure of consensus, and of the distinction between uniform and nonuniform consensus. Finally, the first (early stopping and) unbeatable protocol that treats decision values "fairly" is presented. All of these protocols have very concise descriptions, and are shown to be efficiently implementable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Good, Better, Best! - Unbeatable Protocols for Consensus and Set Consensus

While the very first consensus protocols for the synchronous model were designed to match the worst-case lower bound, deciding in exactly t+1 rounds in all runs, it was soon realized that they could be strictly improved upon by early stopping protocols. These dominate the first ones, by always deciding in at most t+1 rounds, but often much faster. A protocol is unbeatable if it can't be strictly dominated. Unbeatability is often a much more suitable notion of optimality for distributed protocols than worst-case performance. Using a knowledge-based analysis, this paper studies unbeatability for both consensus and k-set consensus. We present unbeatable solutions to non-uniform consensus and k-set consensus, and uniform consensus in synchronous message-passing contexts with crash failures. The k-set consensus problem is much more technically challenging than consensus, and its analysis has triggered the development of the topological approach to distributed computing. Worst-case lower bounds for this problem have required either techniques based on algebraic topology, or reduction-based proofs. Our proof of unbeatability is purely combinatorial, and is a direct, albeit nontrivial, generalization of the one for consensus. We also present an alternative topological unbeatability proof that allows to understand the connection between the connectivity of protocol complexes and the decision time of processes. For the synchronous model, only solutions to the uniform variant of k-set consensus have been offered. Based on our unbeatable protocols for uniform consensus and for non-uniform k-set consensus, we present a uniform k-set consensus protocol that strictly dominates all known solutions to this problem in the synchronous model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Satisfiability and Canonisation of Timely Constraints

We abstractly formulate an analytic problem that arises naturally in the study of coordination in multi-agent systems. Let I be a set of arbitrary cardinality (the set of actions) and assume that for each pair of distinct actions (i,j), we are given a number δ(i,j). We say that a function t, specifying a time for each action, satisfies the timely constraint δ if for every pair of distinct actions (i,j), we have t(j)-t(i) <= δ(i,j) (and thus also t(j)-t(i) >= -δ(j,i)). While the approach that first comes to mind for analysing these definitions is an analytic/geometric one, it turns out that graph-theoretic tools yield powerful results when applied to these definitions. Using such tools, we characterise the set of satisfiable timely constraints, and reduce the problem of satisfiability of a timely constraint to the all-pairs shortest-path problem, and for finite I, furthermore to the negative-cycle detection problem. Moreover, we constructively show that every satisfiable timely constraint has a minimal satisfying function - a key milestone on the way to optimally solving a large class of coordination problems - and reduce the problem of finding this minimal satisfying function, as well as the problems of classifying and comparing timely constraints, to the all-pairs shortest-path problem. At the heart of our analysis lies the constructive definition of a "nicely-behaved" representative for each class of timely constraints sharing the same set of satisfying functions. We show that this canonical representative, as well as the map from such canonical representatives to the the sets of functions satisfying the classes of timely constraints they represent, has many desired properties, which provide deep insights into the structure underlying the above definitions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Timely Common Knowledge

Coordinating activities at different sites of a multi-agent system typically imposes epistemic constraints on the participants. Specifying explicit bounds on the relative times at which actions are performed induces combined temporal and epistemic constraints on when agents can perform their actions. This paper characterises the interactive epistemic state that arises when actions must meet particular temporal constraints. The new state, called timely common knowledge, generalizes common knowledge, as well as other variants of common knowledge. While known variants of common knowledge are defined in terms of a fixed point of an epistemic formula, timely common knowledge is defined in terms of a vectorial fixed point of temporal-epistemic formulae. A general class of coordination tasks with timing constraints is defined, and timely common knowledge is used to characterise both solvability and optimal solutions of such tasks. Moreover, it is shown that under natural conditions, timely common knowledge is equivalent to an infinite conjunction of temporal-epistemic formulae, in analogy to the popular definition of common knowledge.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On Sisterhood in the Gale-Shapley Matching Algorithm

Lying in order to manipulate the Gale-Shapley matching algorithm has been studied by Dubins and Friedman and by Gale and Sotomayor and was shown to be generally more appealing to the proposed-to side (denoted as the women in Gale and Shapley's original paper) than to the proposing side (denoted as men there). It can also be shown that in the case of lying women, for every woman who is better-off due to lying, there exists a man who is worse-off. In this paper, we show that an even stronger dichotomy between the goals of the sexes holds, namely, if no woman is worse-off then no man is better-off, while a form of sisterhood between the lying and the "innocent" women also holds, namely, if none of the former are worse-off, then neither is any of the latter. This paper is based upon an undergraduate ("Amirim") thesis of the first author.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access