Source author record

Xiaoyu Xia

Xiaoyu Xia appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

SoK: Unlearnability and Unlearning for Model Dememorization

Advanced model dememorization methods, including availability poisoning (unlearnability) and machine unlearning, are emerging as key safeguards against data misuse in machine learning (ML). At the training stage, unlearnability embeds imperceptible perturbations into data before release to reduce learnability. At the post-training stage, unlearning removes previously acquired information from models to prevent unauthorized disclosure or use. While both defenses aim to preserve the right to withhold knowledge, their vulnerabilities and shared foundations remain unclear. Specifically, both unlearnability and unlearning suffer from issues such as shallow dememorization, leading to falsely claimed data learnability reduction or forgetting in the presence of weight perturbations. Moreover, input perturbations may affect the effectiveness of downstream unlearning, while unlearning may inadvertently recover domain knowledge hidden by unlearnability. This interplay calls for deeper investigation. Finally, there is a lack of formal guarantees to provide theoretical insights into current defenses against shallow dememorization. In this Systematization of Knowledge, we present the first integrated analysis of model dememorization approaches leveraging unlearnability and unlearning. Our contributions are threefold: (i) a unified taxonomy of unlearnability and scalable unlearning methods; (ii) an empirical evaluation revealing the robustness, interplay, and shallow dememorization of leading methods; and (iii) the first theoretical guarantee on dememorization depth for models processed through certified unlearning. These results lay the foundation for unifying dememorization mechanisms across the ML lifecycle to achieve a deeper immemor state for sensitive knowledge.

preprint2025arXiv

Tunable Hybrid-Mode Coupler Enabling Strong Interactions between Transmons at Centimeter-Scale Distance

The transmon, a fabrication-friendly superconducting qubit, remains a leading candidate for scalable quantum computing. Recent advances in tunable couplers have accelerated progress toward high-performance quantum processors. However, extending coherent interactions beyond millimeter scales to enhance quantum connectivity presents a critical challenge. Here, we introduce a hybrid-mode coupler exploiting resonator-transmon hybridization to simultaneously engineer the two lowest-frequency mode, enabling high-contrast coupling between centimeter-scale transmons. For a 1-cm coupler, our framework predicts flux-tunable $XX$ and $ZZ$ coupling strengths reaching 23 MHz and 100 MHz, with modulation contrasts exceeding $10^2$ and $10^4$, respectively, demonstrating quantitative agreement with an effective two-channel model. This work provides an efficient pathway to mitigate the inherent connectivity constraints imposed by short-range interactions, enabling transmon-based architectures compatible with hardware-efficient quantum tasks.

preprint2024arXiv

Towards Integrated Fine-tuning and Inference when Generative AI meets Edge Intelligence

The high-performance generative artificial intelligence (GAI) represents the latest evolution of computational intelligence, while the blessing of future 6G networks also makes edge intelligence (EI) full of development potential. The inevitable encounter between GAI and EI can unleash new opportunities, where GAI's pre-training based on massive computing resources and large-scale unlabeled corpora can provide strong foundational knowledge for EI, while EI can harness fragmented computing resources to aggregate personalized knowledge for GAI. However, the natural contradictory features pose significant challenges to direct knowledge sharing. To address this, in this paper, we propose the GAI-oriented synthetical network (GaisNet), a collaborative cloud-edge-end intelligence framework that buffers contradiction leveraging data-free knowledge relay, where the bidirectional knowledge flow enables GAI's virtuous-cycle model fine-tuning and task inference, achieving mutualism between GAI and EI with seamless fusion and collaborative evolution. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mechanisms. Finally, we discuss the future challenges and directions in the interplay between GAI and EI.

preprint2022arXiv

Evaluation of Distributed Data Processing Frameworks in Hybrid Clouds

Distributed data processing frameworks (e.g., Hadoop, Spark, and Flink) are widely used to distribute data among computing nodes of a cloud. Recently, there have been increasing efforts aimed at evaluating the performance of distributed data processing frameworks hosted in private and public clouds. However, there is a paucity of research on evaluating the performance of these frameworks hosted in a hybrid cloud, which is an emerging cloud model that integrates private and public clouds to use the best of both worlds. Therefore, in this paper, we evaluate the performance of Hadoop, Spark, and Flink in a hybrid cloud in terms of execution time, resource utilization, horizontal scalability, vertical scalability, and cost. For this study, our hybrid cloud consists of OpenStack (private cloud) and MS Azure (public cloud). We use both batch and iterative workloads for the evaluation. Our results show that in a hybrid cloud (i) the execution time increases as more nodes are borrowed by the private cloud from the public cloud, (ii) Flink outperforms Spark, which in turn outperforms Hadoop in terms of execution time, (iii) Hadoop transfers the largest amount of data among the nodes during the workload execution while Spark transfers the least amount of data, (iv) all three frameworks horizontally scale better as compared to vertical scaling, and (v) Spark is found to be least expensive in terms of $ cost for data processing while Hadoop is found the most expensive.