BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Xiaolong Huang

Xiaolong Huang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.COastro-ph.HEComputation and LanguageComputational ComplexityInformation RetrievalNetworking and Internet Architecturenucl-ex

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Large Search Model: Redefining Search Stack in the Era of LLMs

Modern search engines are built on a stack of different components, including query understanding, retrieval, multi-stage ranking, and question answering, among others. These components are often optimized and deployed independently. In this paper, we introduce a novel conceptual framework called large search model, which redefines the conventional search stack by unifying search tasks with one large language model (LLM). All tasks are formulated as autoregressive text generation problems, allowing for the customization of tasks through the use of natural language prompts. This proposed framework capitalizes on the strong language understanding and reasoning capabilities of LLMs, offering the potential to enhance search result quality while simultaneously simplifying the existing cumbersome search stack. To substantiate the feasibility of this framework, we present a series of proof-of-concept experiments and discuss the potential challenges associated with implementing this approach within real-world search systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Optimal circulant graphs as low-latency network topologies

Communication latency has become one of the determining factors for the performance of parallel clusters. To design low-latency network topologies for high-performance computing clusters, we optimize the diameters, mean path lengths, and bisection widths of circulant topologies. We obtain a series of optimal circulant topologies of size $2^5$ through $2^{10}$ and compare them with torus and hypercube of the same sizes and degrees. We further benchmark on a broad variety of applications including effective bandwidth, FFTE, Graph 500 and NAS parallel benchmarks to compare the optimal circulant topologies and Cartesian products of optimal circulant topologies and fully connected topologies with corresponding torus and hypercube. Simulation results demonstrate superior potentials of the optimal circulant topologies for communication-intensive applications. We also find the strengths of the Cartesian products in exploiting global communication with data traffic patterns of specific applications or internal algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Decay data of radionuclides along the valley of nuclear stability for astrophysical applications

Several directions of the demand of decay data in nuclear astrophysics are discussed for radionuclides near the valley of nuclear stability. The current decay data evaluation results have been presented for a number of radionuclides of astrophysical interest. An extended list of such nuclides is offered for their nuclear characteristics to be further evaluated by the Decay Data Evaluation Project cooperation participants.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Oriented diameter and rainbow connection number of a graph

The oriented diameter of a bridgeless graph $G$ is $\min\{diam(H)\ | H\ is\ an orientation\ of\ G\}$. A path in an edge-colored graph $G$, where adjacent edges may have the same color, is called rainbow if no two edges of the path are colored the same. The rainbow connection number $rc(G)$ of $G$ is the smallest integer $k$ for which there exists a $k$-edge-coloring of $G$ such that every two distinct vertices of $G$ are connected by a rainbow path. In this paper, we obtain upper bounds for the oriented diameter and the rainbow connection number of a graph in terms of $rad(G)$ and $η(G)$, where $rad(G)$ is the radius of $G$ and $η(G)$ is the smallest integer number such that every edge of $G$ is contained in a cycle of length at most $η(G)$. We also obtain constant bounds of the oriented diameter and the rainbow connection number for a (bipartite) graph $G$ in terms of the minimum degree of $G$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Rainbow connections for planar graphs and line graphs

An edge-colored graph $G$ is rainbow connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $rc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow connected. It was proved that computing $rc(G)$ is an NP-Hard problem, as well as that even deciding whether a graph has $rc(G)=2$ is NP-Complete. It is known that deciding whether a given edge-colored graph is rainbow connected is NP-Complete. We will prove that it is still NP-Complete even when the edge-colored graph is a planar bipartite graph. We also give upper bounds of the rainbow connection number of outerplanar graphs with small diameters. A vertex-colored graph is rainbow vertex-connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose internal vertices have distinct colors. The rainbow vertex-connection number of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $rvc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow vertex-connected. It is known that deciding whether a given vertex-colored graph is rainbow vertex-connected is NP-Complete. We will prove that it is still NP-Complete even when the vertex-colored graph is a line graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access