Paper detail

Optimal circulant graphs as low-latency network topologies

Communication latency has become one of the determining factors for the performance of parallel clusters. To design low-latency network topologies for high-performance computing clusters, we optimize the diameters, mean path lengths, and bisection widths of circulant topologies. We obtain a series of optimal circulant topologies of size $2^5$ through $2^{10}$ and compare them with torus and hypercube of the same sizes and degrees. We further benchmark on a broad variety of applications including effective bandwidth, FFTE, Graph 500 and NAS parallel benchmarks to compare the optimal circulant topologies and Cartesian products of optimal circulant topologies and fully connected topologies with corresponding torus and hypercube. Simulation results demonstrate superior potentials of the optimal circulant topologies for communication-intensive applications. We also find the strengths of the Cartesian products in exploiting global communication with data traffic patterns of specific applications or internal algorithms.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.