BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Witold Dzwinel

Witold Dzwinel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceMachine Learningmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Quasi-optimal $hp$-finite element refinements towards singularities via deep neural network prediction

We show how to construct the deep neural network (DNN) expert to predict quasi-optimal $hp$-refinements for a given computational problem. The main idea is to train the DNN expert during executing the self-adaptive $hp$-finite element method ($hp$-FEM) algorithm and use it later to predict further $hp$ refinements. For the training, we use a two-grid paradigm self-adaptive $hp$-FEM algorithm. It employs the fine mesh to provide the optimal $hp$ refinements for coarse mesh elements. We aim to construct the DNN expert to identify quasi-optimal $hp$ refinements of the coarse mesh elements. During the training phase, we use the direct solver to obtain the solution for the fine mesh to guide the optimal refinements over the coarse mesh element. After training, we turn off the self-adaptive $hp$-FEM algorithm and continue with quasi-optimal refinements as proposed by the DNN expert trained. We test our method on three-dimensional Fichera and two-dimensional L-shaped domain problems. We verify the convergence of the numerical accuracy with respect to the mesh size. We show that the exponential convergence delivered by the self-adaptive $hp$-FEM can be preserved if we continue refinements with a properly trained DNN expert. Thus, in this paper, we show that from the self-adaptive $hp$-FEM it is possible to train the DNN expert the location of the singularities, and continue with the selection of the quasi-optimal $hp$ refinements, preserving the exponential convergence of the method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Supermodeling of tumor dynamics with parallel isogeometric analysis solver

Supermodeling is a modern, model-ensembling paradigm that integrates several self-synchronized imperfect sub-models by controlling a few meta-parameters to generate more accurate predictions of complex systems' dynamics. Continual synchronization between sub-models allows for trajectory predictions with superior accuracy compared to a single model or a classical ensemble of independent models whose decision fusion is based on the majority voting or averaging the outcomes. However, it comes out from numerous observations that the supermodeling procedure's convergence depends on a few principal factors such as (1) the number of sub-models, (2) their proper selection, and (3) the choice of the convergent optimization procedure, which assimilates the supermodel meta-parameters to data. Herein, we focus on modeling the evolution of the system described by a set of PDEs. We prove that supermodeling is conditionally convergent to a fixed-point attractor regarding only the supermodel meta-parameters. We investigate the formal conditions of the convergence of the supermodeling scheme theoretically. We employ the Banach fixed point theorem for the supermodeling correction operator, updating the synchronization constants' values iteratively. The "nudging" of the supermodel to the ground truth should be well balanced because both too small and too large attraction to data cause the supermodel desynchronization. The time-step size can control the convergence of the training procedure, by balancing the Lipshitz continuity constant of the PDE operator. All the sub-models have to be close to the ground-truth along the training trajectory but still sufficiently diverse to explore the phase space better. As an example, we discuss the three-dimensional supermodel of tumor evolution to demonstrate the supermodel's perfect fit to artificial data generated based on real medical images.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

SuperNet -- An efficient method of neural networks ensembling

The main flaw of neural network ensembling is that it is exceptionally demanding computationally, especially, if the individual sub-models are large neural networks, which must be trained separately. Having in mind that modern DNNs can be very accurate, they are already the huge ensembles of simple classifiers, and that one can construct more thrifty compressed neural net of a similar performance for any ensemble, the idea of designing the expensive SuperNets can be questionable. The widespread belief that ensembling increases the prediction time, makes it not attractive and can be the reason that the main stream of ML research is directed towards developing better loss functions and learning strategies for more advanced and efficient neural networks. On the other hand, all these factors make the architectures more complex what may lead to overfitting and high computational complexity, that is, to the same flaws for which the highly parametrized SuperNets ensembles are blamed. The goal of the master thesis is to speed up the execution time required for ensemble generation. Instead of training K inaccurate sub-models, each of them can represent various phases of training (representing various local minima of the loss function) of a single DNN [Huang et al., 2017; Gripov et al., 2018]. Thus, the computational performance of the SuperNet can be comparable to the maximum CPU time spent on training its single sub-model, plus usually much shorter CPU time required for training the SuperNet coupling factors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access