Paper detail

Supermodeling of tumor dynamics with parallel isogeometric analysis solver

Supermodeling is a modern, model-ensembling paradigm that integrates several self-synchronized imperfect sub-models by controlling a few meta-parameters to generate more accurate predictions of complex systems' dynamics. Continual synchronization between sub-models allows for trajectory predictions with superior accuracy compared to a single model or a classical ensemble of independent models whose decision fusion is based on the majority voting or averaging the outcomes. However, it comes out from numerous observations that the supermodeling procedure's convergence depends on a few principal factors such as (1) the number of sub-models, (2) their proper selection, and (3) the choice of the convergent optimization procedure, which assimilates the supermodel meta-parameters to data. Herein, we focus on modeling the evolution of the system described by a set of PDEs. We prove that supermodeling is conditionally convergent to a fixed-point attractor regarding only the supermodel meta-parameters. We investigate the formal conditions of the convergence of the supermodeling scheme theoretically. We employ the Banach fixed point theorem for the supermodeling correction operator, updating the synchronization constants' values iteratively. The "nudging" of the supermodel to the ground truth should be well balanced because both too small and too large attraction to data cause the supermodel desynchronization. The time-step size can control the convergence of the training procedure, by balancing the Lipshitz continuity constant of the PDE operator. All the sub-models have to be close to the ground-truth along the training trajectory but still sufficiently diverse to explore the phase space better. As an example, we discuss the three-dimensional supermodel of tumor evolution to demonstrate the supermodel's perfect fit to artificial data generated based on real medical images.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.