BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Wen-Hung Huang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
This report presents a proof to support the correctness of the schedulability test for self-suspending real-time task systems proposed by Jane W. S. Liu in her book titled "Real-Time Systems" (Pages 164-165). The same concept was also implicitly used by Rajkumar, Sha, and Lehoczky in RTSS 1988 (Page 267) for analyzing self-suspending behaviour due to synchronization protocols in multiprocessor systems.
We have recently developed a general schedulability test framework, called k2U, which can be applied to deal with a large variety of task models that have been widely studied in real-time embedded systems. The k2U framework provides several means for the users to convert arbitrary schedulability tests (regardless of platforms and task models) into polynomial-time tests with closed mathematical expressions. However, the applicability (as well as the performance) of the k2U framework relies on the users to index the tasks properly and define certain constant parameters. This report describes how to automatically index the tasks properly and derive those parameters. We will cover several typical schedulability tests in real-time systems to explain how to systematically and automatically derive those parameters required by the k2U framework. This automation significantly empowers the k2U framework to handle a wide range of classes of real-time execution platforms and task models, including uniprocessor scheduling, multiprocessor scheduling, self-suspending task systems, real-time tasks with arrival jitter, services and virtualizations with bounded delays, etc.
This report summarizes two general frameworks, namely k2Q and k2U, that have been recently developed by us. The purpose of this report is to provide detailed evaluations and comparisons of these two frameworks. These two frameworks share some similar characteristics, but they are useful for different application cases. These two frameworks together provide comprehensive means for the users to automatically convert the pseudo polynomial-time tests (or even exponential-time tests) into polynomial-time tests with closed mathematical forms. With the quadratic and hyperbolic forms, k2Q and k2U frameworks can be used to provide many quantitive features to be measured and evaluated, like the total utilization bounds, speed-up factors, etc., not only for uniprocessor scheduling but also for multiprocessor scheduling. These frameworks can be viewed as "blackbox" interfaces for providing polynomial-time schedulability tests and response time analysis for real-time applications. We have already presented their advantages for being applied in some models in the previous papers. However, it was not possible to present a more comprehensive comparison between these two frameworks. We hope this report can help the readers and users clearly understand the difference of these two frameworks, their unique characteristics, and their advantages. We demonstrate their differences and properties by using the traditional sporadic realtime task models in uniprocessor scheduling and multiprocessor global scheduling.
In this paper, we present a general response-time analysis and schedulability-test framework, called k2Q (k to Q). It provides automatic constructions of closed-form quadratic bounds or utilization bounds for a wide range of applications in real-time systems under fixed-priority scheduling. The key of the framework is a $k$-point schedulability test or a $k$-point response time analysis that is based on the utilizations and the execution times of $k-1$ higher-priority tasks. The natural condition of k2Q is a quadratic form for testing the schedulability or analyzing the response time. The response time analysis and the schedulability analysis provided by the framework can be viewed as a "blackbox" interface that can result in sufficient utilization-based analysis. Since the framework is independent from the task and platform models, it can be applied to a wide range of applications. We show the generality of k2Q by applying it to several different task models. k2Q produces better uniprocessor and/or multiprocessor schedulability tests not only for the traditional sporadic task model, but also more expressive task models such as the generalized multi-frame task model and the acyclic task model. Another interesting contribution is that in the past, exponential-time schedulability tests were typically not recommended and most of time ignored due to high complexity. We have successfully shown that exponential-time schedulability tests may lead to good polynomial-time tests (almost automatically) by using the k2Q framework.
To deal with a large variety of workloads in different application domains in real-time embedded systems, a number of expressive task models have been developed. For each individual task model, researchers tend to develop different types of techniques for deriving schedulability tests with different computation complexity and performance. In this paper, we present a general schedulability analysis framework, namely the k2U framework, that can be potentially applied to analyze a large set of real-time task models under any fixed-priority scheduling algorithm, on both uniprocessor and multiprocessor scheduling. The key to k2U is a k-point effective schedulability test, which can be viewed as a "blackbox" interface. For any task model, if a corresponding k-point effective schedulability test can be constructed, then a sufficient utilization-based test can be automatically derived. We show the generality of k2U by applying it to different task models, which results in new and improved tests compared to the state-of-the-art. Analogously, a similar concept by testing only k points with a different formulation has been studied by us in another framework, called k2Q, which provides quadratic bounds or utilization bounds based on a different formulation of schedulability test. With the quadratic and hyperbolic forms, k2Q and k2U frameworks can be used to provide many quantitive features to be measured, like the total utilization bounds, speed-up factors, etc., not only for uniprocessor scheduling but also for multiprocessor scheduling. These frameworks can be viewed as a "blackbox" interface for schedulability tests and response-time analysis.