Paper detail

k2Q: A Quadratic-Form Response Time and Schedulability Analysis Framework for Utilization-Based Analysis

In this paper, we present a general response-time analysis and schedulability-test framework, called k2Q (k to Q). It provides automatic constructions of closed-form quadratic bounds or utilization bounds for a wide range of applications in real-time systems under fixed-priority scheduling. The key of the framework is a $k$-point schedulability test or a $k$-point response time analysis that is based on the utilizations and the execution times of $k-1$ higher-priority tasks. The natural condition of k2Q is a quadratic form for testing the schedulability or analyzing the response time. The response time analysis and the schedulability analysis provided by the framework can be viewed as a "blackbox" interface that can result in sufficient utilization-based analysis. Since the framework is independent from the task and platform models, it can be applied to a wide range of applications. We show the generality of k2Q by applying it to several different task models. k2Q produces better uniprocessor and/or multiprocessor schedulability tests not only for the traditional sporadic task model, but also more expressive task models such as the generalized multi-frame task model and the acyclic task model. Another interesting contribution is that in the past, exponential-time schedulability tests were typically not recommended and most of time ignored due to high complexity. We have successfully shown that exponential-time schedulability tests may lead to good polynomial-time tests (almost automatically) by using the k2Q framework.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.