Source author record

Weiyun Ma

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

3 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Almost 3-Approximate Correlation Clustering in Constant Rounds

We study parallel algorithms for correlation clustering. Each pair among nn objects is labeled as either "similar" or "dissimilar". The goal is to partition the objects into arbitrarily many clusters while minimizing the number of disagreements with the labels. Our main result is an algorithm that for any ε>0ε> 0 obtains a (3+ε)(3+ε)-approximation in O(1/ε)O(1/ε) rounds (of models such as massively parallel computation, local, and semi-streaming). This is a culminating point for the rich literature on parallel correlation clustering. On the one hand, the approximation (almost) matches a natural barrier of 3 for combinatorial algorithms. On the other hand, the algorithm's round-complexity is essentially constant. To achieve this result, we introduce a simple O(1/ε)O(1/ε)-round parallel algorithm. Our main result is to provide an analysis of this algorithm, showing that it achieves a (3+ε)(3+ε)-approximation. Our analysis draws on new connections to sublinear-time algorithms. Specifically, it builds on the work of Yoshida, Yamamoto, and Ito [STOC'09] on bounding the "query complexity" of greedy maximal independent set. To our knowledge, this is the first application of this method in analyzing the approximation ratio of any algorithm.

preprint2020arXiv

New lower bounds for Massively Parallel Computation from query complexity

Roughgarden, Vassilvitskii, and Wang (JACM 18) recently introduced a novel framework for proving lower bounds for Massively Parallel Computation using techniques from boolean function complexity. We extend their framework in two different ways, to capture two common features of Massively Parallel Computation: ∘\circ Adaptivity, where machines can write to and adaptively read from shared memory throughout the execution of the computation. Recent work of Behnezhad et al. (SPAA 19) showed that adaptivity enables significantly improved round complexities for a number of central graph problems. ∘\circ Promise problems, where the algorithm only has to succeed on certain inputs. These inputs may have special structure that is of particular interest, or they may be representative of hard instances of the overall problem. Using this extended framework, we give the first unconditional lower bounds on the complexity of distinguishing whether an input graph is a cycle of length nn or two cycles of length n/2n/2. This promise problem, 1v2-Cycle, has emerged as a central problem in the study of Massively Parallel Computation. We prove that any adaptive algorithm for the 1v2-Cycle problem with I/O capacity O(nε)O(n^{\varepsilon}) per machine requires Ω(1/ε)Ω(1/\varepsilon) rounds, matching a recent upper bound of Behnezhad et al. In addition to strengthening the connections between Massively Parallel Computation and boolean function complexity, we also develop new machinery to reason about the latter. At the heart of our proofs are optimal lower bounds on the query complexity and approximate certificate complexity of the 1v2-Cycle problem.

preprint2020arXiv

The Power of Many Samples in Query Complexity

The randomized query complexity R(f)R(f) of a boolean function f ⁣:{0,1}n→{0,1}f\colon\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\} is famously characterized (via Yao's minimax) by the least number of queries needed to distinguish a distribution D0D_0 over 00-inputs from a distribution D1D_1 over 11-inputs, maximized over all pairs (D0,D1)(D_0,D_1). We ask: Does this task become easier if we allow query access to infinitely many samples from either D0D_0 or D1D_1? We show the answer is no: There exists a hard pair (D0,D1)(D_0,D_1) such that distinguishing D0∞D_0^\infty from D1∞D_1^\infty requires Θ(R(f))Θ(R(f)) many queries. As an application, we show that for any composed function f∘gf\circ g we have R(f∘g)≥Ω(fbs(f)R(g))R(f\circ g) \geq Ω(\mathrm{fbs}(f)R(g)) where fbs\mathrm{fbs} denotes fractional block sensitivity.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.